| Literature DB >> 28143460 |
Ping-Yi Lin1,2, Ching-Tsan Tsai3, Wan-Ling Chuang1, Ya-Hsuan Chao4, I-Horng Pan5, Yu-Kuo Chen6, Chi-Chen Lin7,8,9, Bing-Yen Wang10,11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths worldwide. Marine microalgae are a source of biologically active compounds and are widely consumed as a nutritional supplement in East Asian countries. It has been reported that Chlorella or Chlorella extracts have various beneficial pharmacological compounds that modulate immune responses; however, no studies have investigated the anti-cancer effects of Chlorella sorokiniana (CS) on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Entities:
Keywords: Chlorella sorokiniana; Human non-small cell lung cancer cells; Mitochondrial apoptotic pathway
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28143460 PMCID: PMC5286777 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1611-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Effects of Chlorella sorokiniana (CS) on viability of A549 and CL1-5 cells. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of CS for 24 h following attachment. Cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay. The viability of untreated cells (control) was considered 100%. Each point on the graph represents the mean ± SD of triplicate wells. The data presented are representatives of three independent experiments with similar results. ***P value <0.001 compared with the control group
Fig. 2Effects of CS on cell-cycle distribution and apoptosis in A549 and CL1-5 cells. a Cell-cycle analysis of CS-treated cells. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of CS for 24 h and then subjected to cell cycle analysis. b Flow cytometry analysis of CS-induced apoptosis in A549 and CL1-5 cells. The cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of CS for 24 h and then subjected to Annexin V/PI staining. The means ± SD of the experimental triplicates are presented in the bar graph. All data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. *P value <0.05, **P value <0.01, ***P value <0.001 compared with the control group
Fig. 3Effects of CS on caspase activation in A549 and CL1-5 cells. a Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of CS for 24 h. Total cell proteins were extracted and immunoblotted with antibodies to detect the cleaved forms of caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-3, and PARP. b Cells were treated with CS (250 ng/ml) and/or the indicated caspase inhibitor for 24 h, and then cell viability was analyzed by the MTT assay. The means ± SD of the experimental triplicates are presented in the bar graph. All data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. **P value <0.01, ***P value <0.001 compared with the control group
Fig. 4Effects of CS on mitochondrial membrane potential in A549 and CL1-5 cells. a and b Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of CS for 24 h and then subjected to JC-1 fluorescence dye staining. The change in mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) was examined by flow cytometry. c The means ± SD of the experimental triplicates are presented in the bar graph. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. *P value <0.05, ***P value <0.001 compared with the control group
Fig. 5Effects of CS on the expression of cytosolic cytochrome C, Bcl-2 family and IAP proteins in A549 and CL1-5 cells. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of CS for 24 h. a Cytosolic fractions were extracted and subjected to immunoblotting with anti-cytochrome c antibody. b Total cell proteins were extracted and immunoblotted with antibodies to detect Bcl-2, Bax, XIAP, and survivin. All data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results
Fig. 6Effects of CS on CL1-5 xenograft tumor growth in vivo. a Mean tumor volume was measured at the indicated days after tumor implant. b Representative images of mice containing CL1-5 xenografts on day 21. Experiments were repeated two times and provided similar results