Literature DB >> 28142261

Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.

Niketh Bhashyam1,2, Rafael De la Garza Ramos1,2, Jonathan Nakhla1,2, Rani Nasser1,2, Ajit Jada1,2, Taylor E Purvis3, Daniel M Sciubba3, Merritt D Kinon1,2, Reza Yassari1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to compare 30-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus those after cervical disc replacement (CDR). METHODS The authors used the 2013-2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Included were adult patients who underwent first-time single-level ACDF or CDR for cervical spondylosis or disc herniation. Primary outcome measures were readmission and/or reoperation within 30 days of the original surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of the procedure (ACDF or CDR) on outcome, and results are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 6077 patients met the inclusion criteria; 5590 (92.0%) patients underwent single-level ACDF, and 487 (8.0%) patients underwent CDR. The readmission rates were 2.6% for ACDF and 0.4% for CDR (p = 0.003). When stratified according to age groups, only patients between the ages of 41 and 60 years who underwent ACDF had a significantly higher readmission rate than those who underwent CDR (2.5% vs 0.7%, respectively; p = 0.028). After controlling for patient age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, hypertension, steroid use, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, patients who underwent CDR were significantly less likely to undergo readmission within 30 days than patients who underwent ACDF (OR 0.23 [95% CI 0.06-0.95]; p = 0.041). Patients with a history of COPD (OR 1.97 [95% CI 1.08-3.57]; p = 0.026) or hypertension (OR 1.62 [95% CI 1.10-2.38]; p = 0.013) and those at ASA Class IV (OR 14.6 [95% CI 1.69-125.75]; p = 0.015) were significantly more likely to require readmission within 30 days. The reoperation rates were 1.2% for ACDF and 0.4% for CDR (p = 0.086), and multivariate analysis revealed that CDR was not associated with lower odds of reoperation (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.14-2.55]; p = 0.492). However, increasing age was associated with a higher risk (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.00-1.05]; p = 0.031) of reoperation; a 2% increase in risk per year of age was found. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent single-level ACDF had a higher readmission rate than those who underwent single-level CDR in this study. When stratified according to age, this effect was seen only in the 41- to 60-year age group. No significant difference in the 30-day single-level ACDF and single-level CDR reoperation rates was found. Although patients in the ACDF group were older and sicker, other unmeasured covariates might have accounted for the increased rate of readmission in this group, and further investigation is encouraged.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index; CDR = cervical disc replacement; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; NSQIP; NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; SSI = surgical site infection; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical disc replacement; readmission; reoperation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28142261     DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  8 in total

1.  Trends in National Use of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion from 2006 to 2016.

Authors:  Hannah K Weiss; Jonathan T Yamaguchi; Roxanna M Garcia; Wellington K Hsu; Zachary A Smith; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Austen David Katz; Junho Song; Daniel Bowles; Terence Ng; Eric Neufeld; Sayyida Hasan; Dean Perfetti; Nipun Sodhi; David Essig; Jeff Silber; Sohrab Virk
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

3.  Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF.

Authors:  Brian L Dial; Valentine R Esposito; Richard Danilkowicz; Jeffrey O'Donnell; Barrie Sugarman; Daniel J Blizzard; Melissa E Erickson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-20

4.  Factors Associated with Postoperative Rehospitalization in Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Pei-I Lin; Tai-Hsiang Chen; Hsien-Hui Chung; Tsung-Ming Su; Chen-Chung Ma; Tzu-Chi Ou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Risk Factors of Unplanned Readmission after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Young Ju Lee; Pyung Goo Cho; Keung Nyun Kim; Sang Hyun Kim; Sung Hyun Noh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.052

6.  Impact of body mass index on 30-day outcomes after spinopelvic fixation surgery.

Authors:  Niketh Bhashyam; Rafael De la Garza Ramos; Jonathan Nakhla; Jane Jacob; Murray Echt; Adam Ammar; Rani Nasser; Reza Yassari; Merritt D Kinon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-08-09

7.  Age Stratification of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Excisional Laminectomy for Extradural Cervical and Thoracic Tumors.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Zoe B Cheung; Khushdeep S Vig; Awais K Hussain; Mauricio C Lima; Jun S Kim; John Di Capua; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-12-10

8.  Revision Anterior Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A National Analysis of the Associated Indications, Procedures, and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; Andrei F Joaquim; Venkat Boddapati; Justin Mathew; Paul Park; Jun S Kim; Zeeshan M Sardar; Ronald A Lehman; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.