Literature DB >> 28142146

Incidence of Histologically Proven Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases and Rate of Upstaging in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Audrey Tieko Tsunoda1, Simone Marnitz, Joao Soares Nunes, Carlos Eduardo Mattos de Cunha Andrade, Christovam Scapulatempo Neto, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Jörg Herrmann, Ligia Maria Kerr, Peter Martus, Achim Schneider, Giovanni Favero, Christhardt Köhler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical staging is associated with a significant rate of upstaging compared to clinical/radiological staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the stage-specific percentage of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases and the upstaging ratio in a prospective randomized trial (Uterus-11).
METHODS: FIGO stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer patients were randomized to surgical staging (arm A) or to clinical staging and primary chemoradiation (arm B). Arm B patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of suspicious para-aortic lymph nodes. Confirmed para-aortic metastasis patients received extended-field radiation therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were enrolled, including 120 (arm A) and 114 (arm B) treated per protocol. The groups were well balanced. Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases were identified after surgical staging in 51 and 24% of patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases were confirmed in 45 and 20% of IIB patients and in 71 and 37% of IIIB patients, respectively. Upstaging occurred in 39/120 (33%) in arm A and in 9/114 (8%) in arm B (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The histological results in both groups led to a considerable rate of upstaging. Oncological data from the Uterus-11 study may reveal whether modified therapy translates into a survival benefit.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28142146     DOI: 10.1159/000453666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  7 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Research Progress.

Authors:  He Zhang; Weimin Kong; Shuning Chen; Xiaoling Zhao; Dan Luo; Yunkai Xie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?

Authors:  Ingfrid S Haldorsen; Njål Lura; Jan Blaakær; Daniela Fischerova; Henrica M J Werner
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Audrey Tieko Tsunoda; Peter Martus; Marcelo Vieira; Renato Jose Affonso Junior; João Nunes; Volker Budach; Hermann Hertel; Alexander Mustea; Jalid Sehouli; Jens-Peter Scharf; Uwe Ulrich; Andreas Ebert; Iris Piwonski; Christhardt Kohler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Clinical value of MRI, serum SCCA, and CA125 levels in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis and para-uterine infiltration in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chao Ran; Jian Sun; Yunhui Qu; Na Long
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymph Node Debulking during Staging Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Berta Díaz-Feijoó; Úrsula Acosta; Aureli Torné; Blanca Gil-Ibáñez; Alicia Hernández; Santiago Domingo; Melissa Bradbury; Antonio Gil-Moreno
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Multiparametric Dual-Time-Point [18F]FDG PET/MRI for Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Untreated FIGO I/II Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthias Weissinger; Stefan Kommoss; Johann Jacoby; Stephan Ursprung; Ferdinand Seith; Sascha Hoffmann; Konstantin Nikolaou; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Christian La Fougère; Helmut Dittmann
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.