Emma Björkenstam1, Anne R Pebley2, Bo Burström3, Kyriaki Kosidou4. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health and California Center for Population Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: embjor@ucla.edu. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health and California Center for Population Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Public Health Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Childhood social adversity has been associated with an increased risk of depression and other psychiatric disorders in adolescence and early adulthood. However, the role of timing and accumulation of adversities has not yet been established in longitudinal studies. We examined the association between childhood adversities and adolescent depressive symptoms, and the impact of timing and accumulation of adversity. METHOD: Longitudinal data were obtained from the Child Development Supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (n=2223), a nationally representative survey of US families that incorporates data from parents and their children. Negative binomial regression analysis was used to estimate effects of childhood social adversity on adolescent depressive symptoms, presented as Incidence Rate Ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Children exposed to social adversity reported higher levels of adolescent depressive symptoms captured by two depression scales. Single-parent household and residential instability were particularly associated with depressive symptoms. A positive relationship was found between cumulative adversity and the risk of adolescent depression. The timing of exposure appeared to have little effect on the risk of adolescent depressive symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The structure of the data implies that alternative causal pathways cannot be fully discounted. The self- or parent-reported data is subject to recall bias. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the long-term negative impact of childhood adversity on adolescent depressive symptoms, regardless of when in childhood the adversity occurs. Policies and interventions to reduce adolescent depressive symptoms need to consider the social background of the family as an important risk or protective factor.
OBJECTIVE: Childhood social adversity has been associated with an increased risk of depression and other psychiatric disorders in adolescence and early adulthood. However, the role of timing and accumulation of adversities has not yet been established in longitudinal studies. We examined the association between childhood adversities and adolescent depressive symptoms, and the impact of timing and accumulation of adversity. METHOD: Longitudinal data were obtained from the Child Development Supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (n=2223), a nationally representative survey of US families that incorporates data from parents and their children. Negative binomial regression analysis was used to estimate effects of childhood social adversity on adolescent depressive symptoms, presented as Incidence Rate Ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS:Children exposed to social adversity reported higher levels of adolescent depressive symptoms captured by two depression scales. Single-parent household and residential instability were particularly associated with depressive symptoms. A positive relationship was found between cumulative adversity and the risk of adolescent depression. The timing of exposure appeared to have little effect on the risk of adolescent depressive symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The structure of the data implies that alternative causal pathways cannot be fully discounted. The self- or parent-reported data is subject to recall bias. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the long-term negative impact of childhood adversity on adolescent depressive symptoms, regardless of when in childhood the adversity occurs. Policies and interventions to reduce adolescent depressive symptoms need to consider the social background of the family as an important risk or protective factor.
Authors: Glenn A Melvin; Amanda L Dudley; Michael S Gordon; Sarah Ford; John Taffe; Bruce J Tonge Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Jake M Najman; Mohammad R Hayatbakhsh; Alexandra Clavarino; William Bor; Michael J O'Callaghan; Gail M Williams Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Emma Björkenstam; Bo Burström; Lars Brännström; Bo Vinnerljung; Charlotte Björkenstam; Anne R Pebley Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Christyl T Dawson; Wensong Wu; Kristopher P Fennie; Gladys Ibañez; Miguel Á Cano; Jeremy W Pettit; Mary Jo Trepka Journal: J Community Psychol Date: 2019-06-17
Authors: Rasim S Diler; John A Merranko; Danella Hafeman; Tina R Goldstein; Benjamin I Goldstein; Heather Hower; Mary Kay Gill; David A Axelson; Neal Ryan; Michael Strober; Martin B Keller; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey I Hunt; Lauren M Weinstock; Satish Iyengar; Boris B Birmaher Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 4.839