| Literature DB >> 28142066 |
Caroline L Vandeleur1, Sylfa Fassassi2, Enrique Castelao2, Jennifer Glaus3, Marie-Pierre F Strippoli2, Aurélie M Lasserre2, Dominique Rudaz2, Sirak Gebreab2, Giorgio Pistis2, Jean-Michel Aubry4, Jules Angst5, Martin Preisig2.
Abstract
Although the DSM-5 has suggested the two new categories of Persistent Depressive Disorders (PDD) and Other Specified Depressive Disorders (OSDD), no study so far has applied the DSM-5 criteria throughout the range of depressive disorders. The aims of the present study were to 1) establish the lifetime prevalence of specific depressive disorders according to the new DSM-5 definitions in a community sample, and 2) determine their clinical relevance in terms of socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidity, course and treatment patterns. The semi-structured Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies was administered by masters-level psychologists to a random sample of an urban area (n=3720). The lifetime prevalence was 15.2% for PDD with persistent major depressive episode (MDE), 3.3% for PDD with pure dysthymia, 28.2% for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and 9.1% for OSDD. Subjects with PDD with persistent MDE were the most severely affected, followed by those with recurrent MDD, single episode MDD, PDD with pure dysthymia and OSDD and finally those without depressive disorders. Our data provide further evidence for the clinical significance of mild depressive disorders (OSDD), but cast doubt on the pertinence of lumping together PDD with persistent MDE and the former DSM-IV dysthymic disorder within the new PDD category.Entities:
Keywords: Comorbidity; Course; Major depression; Persistent depression; Prevalence; Subthreshold depression; Treatment
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28142066 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatry Res ISSN: 0165-1781 Impact factor: 3.222