Literature DB >> 28142026

Isolating response inhibition in the brain: Parietal versus frontal contribution.

Tamar Kolodny1, Carmel Mevorach2, Lilach Shalev3.   

Abstract

Response inhibition is a main function of cognitive control and its neural substrates have been studied extensively. However, it is still a question whether previous brain imaging investigations were successful in isolating specific response inhibition activation. In the current study we attempted to pinpoint response inhibition in the brain using a Go/No-go task and fMRI, by contrasting rare-No-go trials with prevalent-No-go trials. Although inhibition is required in all No-go trials, task variants with rare-No-go cases (25%) create a prepotent response which elicits a strong demand for inhibition, while task variants with prevalent-No-go cases (75%) require very little inhibition effort. Since the neural activation in this design is extracted solely from No-go trials, differing only in the extent of inhibitory demand, the analysis avoids contamination of the data with motor effects or visual factors. Using this experimental design we highlight the contribution of the parietal cortex (bilaterally) to inhibitory processes, while casting doubts about the specificity of frontal activation in such processes. Future studies are required to verify that bilateral intraparietal sulcus and left temporo-parietal junction activations could be markers of inhibitory control.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Go/No-go; Intraparietal sulcus; Response inhibition; Temporo-parietal junction; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28142026     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  10 in total

1.  The effect of motor engagement on memory: Testing a motor-induced encoding account.

Authors:  Kaleb T Kinder; Aaron T Buss
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-06

2.  Dissociations of cognitive inhibition, response inhibition, and emotional interference: Voxelwise ALE meta-analyses of fMRI studies.

Authors:  Yuwen Hung; Schuyler L Gaillard; Pavel Yarmak; Marie Arsalidou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Are attention and cognitive control altered by fMRI scanner environment? Evidence from Go/No-go tasks in ADHD.

Authors:  Tamar Kolodny; Carmel Mevorach; Pnina Stern; Maya Ankaoua; Yarden Dankner; Shlomit Tsafrir; Lilach Shalev
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Involvement of the dorsal and ventral attention networks in visual attention span.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Junkai Wang; Chen Huang; Peipeng Liang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Response Hand and Motor Set Differentially Modulate the Connectivity of Brain Pathways During Simple Uni-manual Motor Behavior.

Authors:  Alexandra Morris; Mathura Ravishankar; Lena Pivetta; Asadur Chowdury; Dimitri Falco; Jessica S Damoiseaux; David R Rosenberg; Steven L Bressler; Vaibhav A Diwadkar
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Atypical neural modulation in the right prefrontal cortex during an inhibitory task with eye gaze in autism spectrum disorder as revealed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Takahiro Ikeda; Masahiro Hirai; Takeshi Sakurada; Yukifumi Monden; Tatsuya Tokuda; Masako Nagashima; Hideo Shimoizumi; Ippeita Dan; Takanori Yamagata
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.593

Review 7.  Motor Preparation for Action Inhibition: A Review of Single Pulse TMS Studies Using the Go/NoGo Paradigm.

Authors:  Stefania C Ficarella; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-21

8.  Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition.

Authors:  Pascal Pas; Stefan Du Plessis; Hanna E van den Munkhof; Thomas E Gladwin; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Secondary motor areas for response inhibition: an epicortical recording and stimulation study.

Authors:  Hirofumi Takeyama; Riki Matsumoto; Kiyohide Usami; Takuro Nakae; Akihiro Shimotake; Takayuki Kikuchi; Kazumichi Yoshida; Takeharu Kunieda; Susumu Miyamoto; Ryosuke Takahashi; Akio Ikeda
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-08-04

10.  Response-level processing during visual feature search: Effects of frontoparietal activation and adult age.

Authors:  David J Madden; Rachel E Siciliano; Catherine W Tallman; Zachary A Monge; Andreas Voss; Jessica R Cohen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.