Literature DB >> 28141953

Interposition Dermal Matrix Xenografts: A Successful Alternative to Traditional Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Julie A Neumann1, Miltiadis H Zgonis2, Kathleen D Rickert3, Kendall E Bradley4, Thomas J Kremen5, Blake R Boggess4, Alison P Toth4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of massive rotator cuff tears in shoulders without glenohumeral arthritis remains problematic for surgeons. Repairs of massive rotator cuff tears have failure rates of 20% to 94% at 1 to 2 years postoperatively as demonstrated with arthrography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, inconsistent outcomes have been reported with debridement alone of massive rotator cuff tears, and limitations have been seen with other current methods of operative intervention, including arthroplasty and tendon transfers. HYPOTHESIS: The use of interposition porcine acellular dermal matrix xenograft in patients with massive rotator cuff tears will result in improved subjective outcomes, postoperative pain, function, range of motion, and strength. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Sixty patients (61 shoulders) were prospectively observed for a mean of 50.3 months (range, 24-63 months) after repair of massive rotator cuff tears with porcine acellular dermal matrix xenograft as an interposition graft. Subjective outcome data were obtained with visual analog scale for pain score (0-10, 0 = no pain) and Modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (MASES) score. Active range of motion in flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation were recorded. Strength in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles was assessed manually on a 10-point scale and by handheld dynamometer. Ultrasound was used to assess the integrity of the repair during latest follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean visual analog scale pain score decreased from 4.0 preoperatively to 1.0 postoperatively ( P < .001). Mean active forward flexion improved from 140.7° to 160.4° ( P < .001), external rotation at 0° of abduction from 55.6° to 70.1° ( P = .001), and internal rotation at 90° of abduction from 52.0° to 76.2° ( P < .001). Supraspinatus manual strength increased from 7.7 to 8.8 ( P < .001) and infraspinatus manual strength from 7.7 to 9.3 ( P < .001). Mean dynamometric strength in forward flexion was 77.7 N in nonoperative shoulders (shoulder that did not undergo surgery) and 67.8 N ( P < .001) in operative shoulders (shoulder that underwent rotator cuff repair with interposition porcine dermal matrix xenograft). Mean dynamometric strength in external rotation was 54.5 N in nonoperative shoulders and 50.1 N in operative shoulders ( P = .04). Average postoperative MASES score was 87.8. Musculoskeletal ultrasound showed that 91.8% (56 of 61) of repairs were fully intact; 3.3% (2 of 61), partially intact; and 4.9% (3 of 61), not intact.
CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent repair of massive rotator cuff tears with interposition porcine acellular dermal matrix graft have good subjective function as assessed by the MASES score. Patients have significant improvement in pain, range of motion, and manual muscle strength. Postoperative ultrasound demonstrated that the repair was completely intact in 91.8% of patients, a vast improvement compared with results previously reported for primary repairs of massive rotator cuff tears.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allograft; rotator cuff; tissue grafts

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28141953     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516683945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

Review 1.  Patch Augmentation in Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-10

2.  Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Mathew Baldwin; Cushla Cooper; Navraj S Nagra; Joanna C Crocker; Molly Glaze; Gemma Greenall; Amar Rangan; Lucksy Kottam; Jonathan L Rees; Dair Farrar-Hockley; Naomi Merritt; Sally Hopewell; David Beard; Michael Thomas; Melina Dritsaki; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  How to Use a Graft in Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Literature Review Update of Interposition and Superior Capsule Reconstruction Techniques.

Authors:  Kevin C Wall; Alison P Toth; Grant E Garrigues
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

4.  Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair of large and massive retears using an interpositional bridging dermal allograft.

Authors:  Tanujan Thangarajah; Saho Tsuchiya; Jayd Lukenchuk; Ian K Lo
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-03-19

5.  Interposition grafting for irreparable rotator cuff tears: Systematic review and specialist practice report.

Authors:  Aziz Haque; Amit Modi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-13

6.  Use of biologics in rotator cuff disorders: Current concept review.

Authors:  Mr Lebur Rohman; Martyn Snow
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-15

7.  In Vivo Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds in an Achilles Tendon Defect Model.

Authors:  Carolin Gabler; Jan-Oliver Saß; Susann Gierschner; Tobias Lindner; Rainer Bader; Thomas Tischer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Failure of Dermal Allograft Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Assessment.

Authors:  Conor James Craig Gouk; Ryan Mark Shulman; Craig Buchan; Michael John Evan Thomas; Fraser James Taylor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-05-09

9.  Use of a Novel, Reinforced, Low Immunogenic, Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa Patch to Repair a Supraspinatus Tendon Defect in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Xuancheng Zhang; Zhaoyi Fang; Eunshinae Cho; Kai Huang; Jinzhong Zhao; Jia Jiang; Xiaoqiao Huangfu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Nonarthroplasty Surgical Treatment Options for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Trevor J Carver; Matthew J Kraeutler; John R Smith; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.