Literature DB >> 28141635

Observer influences on pain: an experimental series examining same-sex and opposite-sex friends, strangers, and romantic partners.

Rhiannon Edwards1, Christopher Eccleston, Edmund Keogh.   

Abstract

Despite the well-documented sex and gender differences, little is known about the relative impact of male-female social interactions on pain. Three experiments were conducted to investigate whether the type of interpersonal relationship men and women have with an observer affects how they respond to experimental pain. Study 1 recruited friends and strangers, study 2 examined the effects of same- and opposite-sex friends, whereas study 3 investigated the differences between opposite-sex friends and opposite-sex romantic partners. One hundred forty-four dyads were recruited (48 in each study). One person from each dyad completed 2 pain tasks, whereas the other person observed in silence. Overall, the presence of another person resulted in an increase in pain threshold and tolerance on the cold-pressor task and algometer. The sex status of the dyads also had a role, but only within the friendship groups. In particular, male friends had the most pronounced effect on men's pain, increasing pain tolerance. We suggest that the presence of an observer, their sex, and the nature of the participant-observer relationship all influence how pain is reported. Further research should focus on dyadic relationships, and their influence on how men and women report and communicate pain in specific contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28141635     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  9 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative sex differences in pain processing: emerging evidence of a biased literature.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Pain expectation and avoidance in the social context: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Alessandro Piedimonte; Denisa Adina Zamfira; Giulia Guerra; Sergio Vighetti; Elisa Carlino
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 3.  Neuronal and glial factors contributing to sex differences in opioid modulation of pain.

Authors:  Dayna L Averitt; Lori N Eidson; Hillary H Doyle; Anne Z Murphy
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Accurate empathy of romantic partners increases pain ratings but promotes recovery.

Authors:  Binghai Sun; Lingyan Zhou; Weilong Xiao; Xiaoqian Zhao; Wenhai Zhang; Weijian Li
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2018-09-27

5.  The skin conductance response indicating pain relief is independent of self or social influence on pain.

Authors:  Marthe Gründahl; Leonie Retzlaff; Martin J Herrmann; Grit Hein; Marta Andreatta
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  Psychosocial factors and their influence on the experience of pain.

Authors:  Lincoln M Tracy
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-07-11

7.  Contextual influences in decoding pain expressions: effects of patient age, informational priming, and observer characteristics.

Authors:  Amy J D Hampton; Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Michelle M Gagnon
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.926

8.  Self-Compassion Demonstrating a Dual Relationship with Pain Dependent on High-Frequency Heart Rate Variability.

Authors:  Shuxiang Tian; Xi Luo; Xianwei Che; Guizhi Xu
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Attentional control moderates the relationship between pain catastrophizing and selective attention to pain faces on the antisaccade task.

Authors:  Seyran Ranjbar; Mahdi Mazidi; Louise Sharpe; Mohsen Dehghani; Ali Khatibi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.