BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of a freely available smartphone application, Cardiio app (Cardiio, Inc., Cambridge, MA), to measure heart rate from the finger or face using imaging photoplethysmography, by comparing against an FDA-cleared pulse oximeter at rest, and after moderate to vigorous exercise. METHODS: A total of 40 healthy adults participated in this study. Participants engaged in a period of rest, followed by 3 min of moderate to vigorous intensity cycling on a stationary bicycle. Heart rate measurements were obtained from both the finger and face of participants using the Cardiio app at rest, immediately after exercise, 1-2 min after exercise, and 2-3 min after exercise. Concurrent heart rate readings using an FDA-cleared finger pulse oximeter served as the reference measurement. RESULTS: There was a very strong agreement between heart rate measurements obtained using the Cardiio app and the pulse oximeter, both at rest (r = 0.99 for finger, r = 0.97 for face) and after exercise (r = 0.99 for finger, r = 0.97 for face). At rest, the accuracy of the Cardiio app was ±1.58 beats per minute (bpm) (or ±2.27%) using the finger mode and ±2.28 bpm (or ±3.17%) for the face mode, compared to the pulse oximeter. After moderate to vigorous exercise, the accuracy of the Cardiio app was ±2.97 bpm (or ±2.79%) using the finger mode and ±5.31 bpm (or ±4.50%) for the face mode, compared to the pulse oximeter. CONCLUSION: The Cardiio app provided accurate heart rate measurements from the finger and face, both at rest and after exercise.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of a freely available smartphone application, Cardiio app (Cardiio, Inc., Cambridge, MA), to measure heart rate from the finger or face using imaging photoplethysmography, by comparing against an FDA-cleared pulse oximeter at rest, and after moderate to vigorous exercise. METHODS: A total of 40 healthy adults participated in this study. Participants engaged in a period of rest, followed by 3 min of moderate to vigorous intensity cycling on a stationary bicycle. Heart rate measurements were obtained from both the finger and face of participants using the Cardiio app at rest, immediately after exercise, 1-2 min after exercise, and 2-3 min after exercise. Concurrent heart rate readings using an FDA-cleared finger pulse oximeter served as the reference measurement. RESULTS: There was a very strong agreement between heart rate measurements obtained using the Cardiio app and the pulse oximeter, both at rest (r = 0.99 for finger, r = 0.97 for face) and after exercise (r = 0.99 for finger, r = 0.97 for face). At rest, the accuracy of the Cardiio app was ±1.58 beats per minute (bpm) (or ±2.27%) using the finger mode and ±2.28 bpm (or ±3.17%) for the face mode, compared to the pulse oximeter. After moderate to vigorous exercise, the accuracy of the Cardiio app was ±2.97 bpm (or ±2.79%) using the finger mode and ±5.31 bpm (or ±4.50%) for the face mode, compared to the pulse oximeter. CONCLUSION: The Cardiio app provided accurate heart rate measurements from the finger and face, both at rest and after exercise.
Entities:
Keywords:
e-health; mobile health; photoplethysmography; pulse rate; smartphone
Authors: Bryan P Yan; William H S Lai; Christy K Y Chan; Stephen Chun-Hin Chan; Lok-Hei Chan; Ka-Ming Lam; Ho-Wang Lau; Chak-Ming Ng; Lok-Yin Tai; Kin-Wai Yip; Olivia T L To; Ben Freedman; Yukkee C Poh; Ming-Zher Poh Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Matheus Oliveira de Jesus; Thatiane Lopes Valentim Di Paschoale Ostolin; Neli Leite Proença; Rodrigo Pereira da Silva; Victor Zuniga Dourado Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 3.390