Literature DB >> 28140503

Two-step adaptive management for choosing between two management actions.

Alana L Moore1,2, Leila Walker3, Michael C Runge4, Eve McDonald-Madden5, Michael A McCarthy1.   

Abstract

Adaptive management is widely advocated to improve environmental management. Derivations of optimal strategies for adaptive management, however, tend to be case specific and time consuming. In contrast, managers might seek relatively simple guidance, such as insight into when a new potential management action should be considered, and how much effort should be expended on trialing such an action. We constructed a two-time-step scenario where a manager is choosing between two possible management actions. The manager has a total budget that can be split between a learning phase and an implementation phase. We use this scenario to investigate when and how much a manager should invest in learning about the management actions available. The optimal investment in learning can be understood intuitively by accounting for the expected value of sample information, the benefits that accrue during learning, the direct costs of learning, and the opportunity costs of learning. We find that the optimal proportion of the budget to spend on learning is characterized by several critical thresholds that mark a jump from spending a large proportion of the budget on learning to spending nothing. For example, as sampling variance increases, it is optimal to spend a larger proportion of the budget on learning, up to a point: if the sampling variance passes a critical threshold, it is no longer beneficial to invest in learning. Similar thresholds are observed as a function of the total budget and the difference in the expected performance of the two actions. We illustrate how this model can be applied using a case study of choosing between alternative rearing diets for hihi, an endangered New Zealand passerine. Although the model presented is a simplified scenario, we believe it is relevant to many management situations. Managers often have relatively short time horizons for management, and might be reluctant to consider further investment in learning and monitoring beyond collecting data from a single time period.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  Bayesian experimental design; adaptive management; decision analysis; expected value of perfect and sample information; monitoring costs; optimal sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28140503     DOI: 10.1002/eap.1515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  3 in total

1.  Value of sample information in dynamic, structurally uncertain resource systems.

Authors:  Byron K Williams; Fred A Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Control fast or control smart: When should invading pathogens be controlled?

Authors:  Robin N Thompson; Christopher A Gilligan; Nik J Cunniffe
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Anticipating future learning affects current control decisions: A comparison between passive and active adaptive management in an epidemiological setting.

Authors:  Benjamin D Atkins; Chris P Jewell; Michael C Runge; Matthew J Ferrari; Katriona Shea; William J M Probert; Michael J Tildesley
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.691

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.