Literature DB >> 28140441

Effects of humerus intraosseous versus intravenous amiodarone administration in a hypovolemic porcine model.

Cpt Monica M Holloway1, Cpt Shannan L Jurina1, Cpt Joshua D Orszag1, Lt George R Bragdon1, Lt Rustin D Green1, Jose C Garcia-Blanco2, Brian E Benham1, Ltc Timothy S Adams1, Don Johnson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of amiodarone administration by humerus intraosseous (HIO) and intravenous (IV) routes on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), time to ROSC, and mean concentrations over time in a hypovolemic cardiac arrest model.
DESIGN: Prospective, between subjects, randomized experimental design.
SETTING: TriService Research Facility.
SUBJECTS: Yorkshire-cross swine (n = 28). INTERVENTION: Swine were anesthetized and placed into cardiac arrest. After 2 minutes, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated. After an additional 2 minutes, amiodarone 300 mg was administered via the HIO or the IV route. Blood samples were collected over 5 minutes. The samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: ROSC, Tmax, Cmax, time to ROSC, and mean concentrations over time.
RESULTS: There was no difference in ROSC between the HIO and IV groups; each had five achieve ROSC and two that did not (p = 1). There was no difference in Tmax (p = 0.501) or in Cmax between HIO and IV groups (p = 0.232). Means ± standard deviations in seconds were 94.3 ± 78.3 compared to 115.7 ± 87.3 in the IV versus HIO groups, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation in nanograms per milliliter for the HIO was 49,041 ± 21,107 and 74,258 ± 33,176 for the IV group. There were no significant differences between the HIO and IV groups relative to time to ROSC (p = 0.220). A repeated analysis of variance indicated that there were no significant differences between the groups relative to concentrations over time (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The humerus intraosseous provides rapid and reliable access to administer life-saving medications during cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28140441     DOI: 10.5055/ajdm.2016.0248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Disaster Med        ISSN: 1932-149X


  2 in total

1.  Impaired Pharmacokinetics of Amiodarone under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Mickaël Lescroart; Claire Pressiat; Benjamin Péquignot; N'Guyen Tran; Jean-Louis Hébert; Nassib Alsagheer; Nicolas Gambier; Bijan Ghaleh; Julien Scala-Bertola; Bruno Levy
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 6.525

2.  Validation of intraosseous delivery of valproic acid in a swine model of polytrauma.

Authors:  Ben E Biesterveld; Rachel O'Connell; Michael T Kemp; Glenn K Wakam; Aaron M Williams; Manjunath P Pai; Hasan B Alam
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-03-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.