P E Bailey1,2, J van Roosmalen3,4, G Mola5, C Evans6, L de Bernis7, B Dao8. 1. Global Health Programs, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA. 2. Averting Maternal Death & Disability, Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Port Moresby General Hospital, Port Moresby, NCD, Papua New Guinea. 6. Global Learning Office, Jhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Auriolles, Bias, France. 8. Jhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of assisted vaginal delivery (AVD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting what level of care procedures were performed and identifying systemic barriers to its use. DESIGN: Cross-sectional health facility assessments. SETTING: Up to 40 countries in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. POPULATION: Assessments tended to be national in scope and included all hospitals and samples of midlevel facilities in public and private sectors. METHODS: Descriptive secondary data analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of facilities where health workers performed AVD in the 3 months prior to the assessment, instrument preference, which health workers performed the procedure, and reasons AVD was not practiced. RESULTS: Fewer than 20% of facilities in Latin America reported performing AVD in the last 3 months. In sub-Saharan Africa, 53% of 1728 hospitals had performed AVD but only 6% of nearly 10 000 health centres had done so. It was not uncommon to find <1% of institutional births delivered by AVD. Vacuum extraction appears preferred over forceps. Lack of equipment and trained health workers were the most frequent reasons for non-performance. CONCLUSIONS: The low use of AVD in LMICs is in contrast with many high-income countries, where high caesarean rates are also associated with significant rates of AVD. In many LMICs, rising caesarean rates have not been associated with maintenance of skills and practice of AVD. AVD is underused precisely in countries where pregnant women continue to face hardships accessing emergency obstetric care and where caesarean delivery can be relatively unsafe. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Many LMICs exhibit low use of assisted vaginal delivery where access to EmONC continues to be a hardship.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of assisted vaginal delivery (AVD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting what level of care procedures were performed and identifying systemic barriers to its use. DESIGN: Cross-sectional health facility assessments. SETTING: Up to 40 countries in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. POPULATION: Assessments tended to be national in scope and included all hospitals and samples of midlevel facilities in public and private sectors. METHODS: Descriptive secondary data analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of facilities where health workers performed AVD in the 3 months prior to the assessment, instrument preference, which health workers performed the procedure, and reasons AVD was not practiced. RESULTS: Fewer than 20% of facilities in Latin America reported performing AVD in the last 3 months. In sub-Saharan Africa, 53% of 1728 hospitals had performed AVD but only 6% of nearly 10 000 health centres had done so. It was not uncommon to find <1% of institutional births delivered by AVD. Vacuum extraction appears preferred over forceps. Lack of equipment and trained health workers were the most frequent reasons for non-performance. CONCLUSIONS: The low use of AVD in LMICs is in contrast with many high-income countries, where high caesarean rates are also associated with significant rates of AVD. In many LMICs, rising caesarean rates have not been associated with maintenance of skills and practice of AVD. AVD is underused precisely in countries where pregnant women continue to face hardships accessing emergency obstetric care and where caesarean delivery can be relatively unsafe. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Many LMICs exhibit low use of assisted vaginal delivery where access to EmONC continues to be a hardship.
Authors: Ganga L Verma; Jessica J Spalding; Marc D Wilkinson; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Vannevel; Fidelma O'Mahony Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-24
Authors: Margo S Harrison; Sarah Saleem; Sumera Ali; Omrana Pasha; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Ana L Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Shivaprasad S Goudar; S M Dhaded; Bhala Kodkany; Richard J Derman; Archana Patel; Patricia L Hibberd; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Antoinette Tshefu; Adrien Lokangaka; Melissa Bauserman; Carl L Bose; Fernando Althabe; Jose M Belizan; Pierre Buekens; Janet L Moore; Dennis D Wallace; Menachem Miodovnik; Marion Koso-Thomas; Elizabeth M McClure; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Javier A Schvartzman; Hugo Krupitzki; Mario Merialdi; Ana Pilar Betrán; Jennifer Requejo; My Huong Nguyen; Effy Vayena; Angel E Fiorillo; Enrique C Gadow; Francisco M Vizcaino; Felicitas von Petery; Victoria Marroquin; María Luisa Cafferata; Agustina Mazzoni; Valerie Vannevel; Robert C Pattinson; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Fernando Althabe; Mercedes Bonet Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Lisa van der Spek; Sterre Sanglier; Hillary M Mabeya; Thomas van den Akker; Paul L J M Mertens; Tanja A J Houweling Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2020-07-08
Authors: Elizabeth G Henry; Donald M Thea; Davidson H Hamer; William DeJong; Kebby Musokotwane; Kenneth Chibwe; Godfrey Biemba; Katherine Semrau Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2017-10-10