Brian C Baumann1, John C Baumann2, John P Christodouleas3, Edward Soffen2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: brian.baumann@wustl.edu. 2. Princeton Radiation Oncology, Princeton, NJ. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Local recurrence (LR) of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a serious problem. Our purpose was to determine if reduced-dose salvage brachytherapy could achieve high rates of biochemical control with acceptable toxicity if combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with LR after EBRT were treated with salvage brachytherapy plus ADT from 1998 to 2013. All had pathologically confirmed LR, disease-free interval ≥18 months after EBRT, no distant/nodal metastasis, and International Prostate Symptom Score ≤15. Whole-gland salvage treatment was delivered using low-dose-rate (median 100 Gy with 103Pd, n = 25) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (30 Gy in 6 fractions over 4 weeks, n = 8) plus 4-6 months of neoadjuvant plus adjuvant ADT. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent had high-risk disease at diagnosis. Median EBRT dose was 70.2 Gy; median prostate-specific antigen nadir was 0.8 ng/mL. Median time to recurrence was 56 months; median presalvage prostate-specific antigen was 5.0 ng/mL. Median postbrachytherapy followup was 61 months (range 7-150 months). Five and 7-year relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 79% and 67%; 93% and 86%; and 94% and 85%, respectively. Freedom from late Grade 3 GU toxicity at 5 years was 85%. There were no late Grade ≥2 GI toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of salvage brachytherapy combined with neoadjuvant plus adjuvant ADT and uses reduced-dose brachytherapy. Results suggest that reduced-dose salvage brachytherapy is feasible and reasonably well tolerated when combined with ADT. Compared to prior series, this approach was associated with favorable relapse-free survival. Prospective studies of reduced-dose salvage brachytherapy plus ADT are warranted.
PURPOSE: Local recurrence (LR) of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a serious problem. Our purpose was to determine if reduced-dose salvage brachytherapy could achieve high rates of biochemical control with acceptable toxicity if combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with LR after EBRT were treated with salvage brachytherapy plus ADT from 1998 to 2013. All had pathologically confirmed LR, disease-free interval ≥18 months after EBRT, no distant/nodal metastasis, and International Prostate Symptom Score ≤15. Whole-gland salvage treatment was delivered using low-dose-rate (median 100 Gy with 103Pd, n = 25) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (30 Gy in 6 fractions over 4 weeks, n = 8) plus 4-6 months of neoadjuvant plus adjuvant ADT. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent had high-risk disease at diagnosis. Median EBRT dose was 70.2 Gy; median prostate-specific antigen nadir was 0.8 ng/mL. Median time to recurrence was 56 months; median presalvage prostate-specific antigen was 5.0 ng/mL. Median postbrachytherapy followup was 61 months (range 7-150 months). Five and 7-year relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 79% and 67%; 93% and 86%; and 94% and 85%, respectively. Freedom from late Grade 3 GU toxicity at 5 years was 85%. There were no late Grade ≥2 GI toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of salvage brachytherapy combined with neoadjuvant plus adjuvant ADT and uses reduced-dose brachytherapy. Results suggest that reduced-dose salvage brachytherapy is feasible and reasonably well tolerated when combined with ADT. Compared to prior series, this approach was associated with favorable relapse-free survival. Prospective studies of reduced-dose salvage brachytherapy plus ADT are warranted.
Authors: Randall J Brenneman; Edward Soffen; Hiram A Gay; Peter F Orio; John P Christodouleas; John C Baumann; Brian C Baumann Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2019-07
Authors: O Pons-Llanas; J Burgos-Burgos; S Roldan-Ortega; A Conde-Moreno; F Celada-Alvarez; J C Ruiz-Martinez; F Lliso-Valverde; A Tormo-Micó; J Perez-Calatayud; J López-Torrecilla Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2020-07-05
Authors: Leszek Miszczyk; Małgorzata Stąpór-Fudzińska; Marcin Miszczyk; Bogusław Maciejewski; Andrzej Tukiendorf Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-01
Authors: Finbar Slevin; Samantha Hodgson; Sree Lakshmi Rodda; Peter Bownes; David Bottomley; Ese Adiotomre; Bashar Al-Qaisieh; Emma Dugdale; Oliver Hulson; Joshua Mason; Jonathan Smith; Ann M Henry Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-03-27
Authors: Jim Zhong; Finbar Slevin; Andrew F Scarsbrook; Maria Serra; Ananya Choudhury; Peter J Hoskin; Sarah Brown; Ann M Henry Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Metha Maenhout; Max Peters; Marco van Vulpen; Marinus A Moerland; Richard P Meijer; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Paul L Nguyen; Steven J Frank; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-12-05
Authors: F Barbera; L Triggiani; M Buglione; P Ghirardelli; P Vitali; B Caraffini; P Borghetti; D Greco; L Bardoscia; N Pasinetti; L Costa; M Maddalo; B Ghedi; B La Face; S M Magrini Journal: Clin Med Insights Oncol Date: 2017-11-07