Literature DB >> 28139370

Lymph node density vs. the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM nodal staging system in node-positive bladder cancer in patients undergoing extended or super-extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Donghyun Lee1, Sangjun Yoo1, Dalsan You1, Bumsik Hong1, Yong Mee Cho2, Jun Hyuk Hong1, Choung-Soo Kim1, Hanjonh Ahn1, Jae Y Ro3, In Gab Jeong4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the prognostic value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM nodal staging system with that of lymph node (LN) density in patients with LN-positive bladder cancer who received extended or super-extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
METHODS: Of the 1,018 patients, who underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between February 2005 and August 2014, 110 patients with LN metastases with extended (n = 68) or super-extended (n = 42) pelvic lymphadenectomy were included. All patients were staged using the 2002 (sixth edition) and 2010 (seventh edition) AJCC TNM staging systems. The association of several variables with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated.
RESULTS: The median number of total LNs removed was 29 (6-118) and the median LN density was 12.5% (1.6%-100%). RFS and OS were not significantly different between the 2002 (pN1-pM1) and 2010 (pN1-N3) AJCC TNM nodal staging systems (sixth edition: P = 0.512 and P = 0.519; seventh edition: P = 0.676 and P = 0.671, respectively). The 2-year RFS and OS rates according to the LN density quartiles were 58.5% and 76.9% in Q1, 39.1% and 70.8% in Q2, 28.8% and 50.1% in Q3, and 12.7% and 20.8% in Q4 (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis adjusted for the 2010 AJCC TNM staging system showed that LN density was associated with a decreased OS (HR = 1.024; 95% CI: 1.010-1.039; P = 0.001). The nodal staging system (2002 or 2010) was not associated with the RFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: LN density shows a better prognostic value than the AJCC TNM nodal staging system in patients with LN-positive bladder cancer receiving extended or super-extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymph node excision; Neoplasm staging; Prognosis; Urinary bladder neoplasm

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28139370     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  5 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to bladder cancer pathology.

Authors:  Eva Compérat; Justine Varinot; Julien Moroch; Caroline Eymerit-Morin; Fadi Brimo
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Is nodal disease burden relevant in patients with renal cell carcinoma and lymph node invasion?

Authors:  Francisco Rodriguez-Covarrubias
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

3.  Can American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic groups be individualized in patients undergoing surgery for Stage IV invasive upper tract Urothelial Carcinoma?

Authors:  Zaishang Li; Xueying Li; Ying Liu; Jiequn Fang; Xueqi Zhang; Kefeng Xiao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Development of a prognostic signature for bladder cancer based on immune-related genes.

Authors:  Ying-Rui Shi; Kun Xiong; Xu Ye; Pei Yang; Zheng Wu; Xiong-Bing Zu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

5.  Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Density in Patients With T3 and T4 Pyriform Sinus Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lifeng Jia; Jingya Li; Ziyuan Zhou; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.