Literature DB >> 28139240

Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial.

Alison Coates1, Allen Kung2, Emily Mounts3, John Hesla3, Brandon Bankowski3, Elizabeth Barbieri3, Baris Ata4, Jacques Cohen5, Santiago Munné5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two commonly used protocols (fresh vs. vitrified) used to transfer euploid blastocysts after IVF with preimplantation genetic screening.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Private assisted reproduction center. PATIENT(S): A total of 179 patients undergoing IVF treatment using preimplantation genetic screening. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized at the time of hCG administration to either a freeze-all cycle or a fresh day 6 ET during the stimulated cycle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rates (sac/embryo transferred), ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs) (beyond 8 weeks), and live birth rate per ET in the primary transfer cycle. RESULT(S): Implantation rate per embryo transferred showed an improvement in the frozen group compared with the fresh group, but not significantly (75% vs. 67%). The ongoing PR (80% vs. 61%) and live birth rates (77% vs. 59%) were significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group. CONCLUSION(S): Either treatment protocol investigated in the present study can be a reasonable option for patients. Freezing all embryos allows for inclusion of all blastocysts in the cohort of embryos available for transfer, which also results in a higher proportion of patients reaching ET. These findings suggest a trend toward favoring the freeze-all option as a preferred transfer strategy when using known euploid embryos. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02000349.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PGS; aneuploidy; embryos; transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28139240     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  40 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Genetics and Epigenetics of Infertility and Treatments on Outcomes.

Authors:  Margareta D Pisarska; Jessica L Chan; Kate Lawrenson; Tania L Gonzalez; Erica T Wang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Comparison of daily vaginal progesterone gel plus weekly intramuscular progesterone with daily intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in single, autologous euploid frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  Mehmet Resit Asoglu; Cem Celik; Lale Susan Karakis; Necati Findikli; Meral Gultomruk; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Frozen embryo transfer can be performed in the cycle immediately following the freeze-all cycle.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general population.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Levent Donmez; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening for women older than 37 undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Stephen C Collins; Xiao Xu; Winifred Mak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Authors:  Katherine L Palmerola; Sally F Vitez; Selma Amrane; Catha P Fischer; Eric J Forman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Tjitske Zaat; Miriam Zagers; Femke Mol; Mariëtte Goddijn; Madelon van Wely; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.