Literature DB >> 28139088

Investigating Regional Variation of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device Implant Rates in European Healthcare Systems: What Drives Differences?

Aleksandra Torbica1,2, Helen Banks1, Cinzia Valzania3, Giuseppe Boriani4, Giovanni Fattore1,2.   

Abstract

Despite established efficacy for cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), large differences in CIED implant rates have been documented across and within countries. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of socio-economic, epidemiological and supply side factors on CIED implant rates across 57 Regions in 5 EU countries and to assess the feasibility of using administrative data for this purpose. A total of 1 330 098 hospitalizations for CIED procedures extracted from hospital discharge databases in Austria, England, Germany, Italy and Slovenia from 2008 to 2012 was used in the analysis. Higher levels of tertiary education among the labour force and percent of aged population are positively associated with implant rates of CIED. Regional per capita GDP and number of implanting centres appear to have no significant effect. Institutional factors are shown to be important for the diffusion of CIED. Wide variation in CIED implant rates across and within five EU countries is undeniable. However, regional factors play a limited part in explaining these differences with few exceptions. Administrative databases are a valuable source of data for investigating the diffusion of medical technologies, while the choice of appropriate modelling strategy is crucial in identifying the drivers for variation across countries.
© 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; cardiovascular implant devices; diffusion; implant rates; regional variation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28139088     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

1.  Facility-Level Variation and Clinical Outcomes in Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With and Without an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Rita Volya; Laura A Hatfield
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-12

2.  Causes of Differences in The Uptake of Cardiac Implantation Electronic Devices in Slovenia in Comparison To Other Countries.

Authors:  Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Renata Erker; Marko Divjak
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2018-01-05

Review 3.  A scoping review of core outcome sets and their 'mapping' onto real-world data using prostate cancer as a case study.

Authors:  Michela Meregaglia; Oriana Ciani; Helen Banks; Maximilian Salcher-Konrad; Caroline Carney; Sahan Jayawardana; Paula Williamson; Giovanni Fattore
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Regional variation in the use of catheter ablation for patients with arrhythmia in Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Inoue; Hiroyo Kuwabara
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-11-21

5.  Variation in regional implantation patterns of cardiac implantable electronic device in Switzerland.

Authors:  Lucy Bolt; Maria M Wertli; Alan G Haynes; Nicolas Rodondi; Arnaud Chiolero; Radoslaw Panczak; Drahomir Aujesky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-term follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with regard to appropriate therapy, complications, and mortality.

Authors:  Gustav Mattsson; Peter Magnusson
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.976

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.