Literature DB >> 28139086

Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.

Rosanna Tarricone1,2, Aleksandra Torbica1,2, Michael Drummond1,3.   

Abstract

There are particular characteristics of Medical Devices, such as the device-user interaction, the incremental nature of innovation and the broader organizational impact that lead to additional challenges for health technology assessment (HTA). The project explored key aspects of the conduct and methods of HTA for MDs. Systematic reviews and original research studies were conducted to determine improvements in processes and methods that could enhance the potential for HTA and optimize the diffusion of MDs. Regulatory processes for MDs should be more closely aligned, the HTA evaluative framework should be harmonized and processes for conditional coverage and evidence development should be used. The methods for HTA should consider MDs as complex interventions, require the establishment of high quality registries, consider an iterative approach to the evaluation over time, recognize and allow for the particular characteristics of devices and use appropriate approaches for confounder adjustment in comparative effectiveness studies. To optimize the diffusion, a common classification should be developed across countries in order to facilitate international comparisons, factors driving diffusion should be explored in HTA reports and physicians' personal goals and motivation should be better understood. The key recommendations of the MedtecHTA project should improve the conduct and use of HTA for MDs.
© 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MedtecHTA; economic evaluation; health technology assessment; medical devices; methods; recommendations

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28139086     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  13 in total

1.  Decision uncertainty and value of further research: a case-study in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; David Epstein; Claire Rothery; Rod S Taylor; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  ASSESSING THE VALUE OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES AND DIAGNOSTICS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CLEAR AND RELEVANT CLAIMS OF BENEFIT.

Authors:  Bruce Campbell; Mark Campbell; Lee Dobson; Joanne Higgins; Bernice Dillon; Mirella Marlow; Chris J D Pomfrett
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Reimbursement pricing for new medical devices in Japan: Is the evaluation of innovation appropriate?

Authors:  Makoto Tamura; Shohei Nakano; Takuma Sugahara
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2018-12-14

4.  Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices.

Authors:  Maximilian Blüher; Sita J Saunders; Virginie Mittard; Rafael Torrejon Torres; Jason A Davis; Rhodri Saunders
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges.

Authors:  Rita Daubner-Bendes; Sándor Kovács; Maciej Niewada; Mirjana Huic; Michael Drummond; Oriana Ciani; Carl Rudolf Blankart; Olena Mandrik; Aleksandra Torbica; John Yfantopoulos; Guenka Petrova; Malwina Holownia-Voloskova; Rod S Taylor; Maiwenn Al; Oresta Piniazhko; László Lorenzovici; Rosanna Tarricone; Antal Zemplényi; Zoltán Kaló
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-08

6.  Endovascular versus surgical creation of arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients: Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses.

Authors:  Carla Rognoni; Matteo Tozzi; Rosanna Tarricone
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.283

7.  Cost-effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer in the UK.

Authors:  Muhieddine Labban; Prokar Dasgupta; Chao Song; Russell Becker; Yanli Li; Usha Seshadri Kreaden; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  Health Technology Optimization Analysis: Conceptual Approach and Illustrative Application.

Authors:  Charles Yan; Yufei Zheng; Michael D Hill; Balraj Mann; Thomas Jeerakathil; Noreen Kamal; Shy Amlani; Anderson W Chuck
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2018-05-08

9.  Hospital contextual factors affecting the implementation of health technologies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adriano Grossi; Ilda Hoxhaj; Irene Gabutti; Maria Lucia Specchia; Americo Cicchetti; Stefania Boccia; Chiara de Waure
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Impact of Guidelines on the Diffusion of Medical Technology: A Case Study of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the UK.

Authors:  Rucha Vadia; Tom Stargardt
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.