Literature DB >> 28139044

Quality of referral: What information should be included in a request for diagnostic imaging when a patient is referred to a clinical radiologist?

Alexander G Pitman1.   

Abstract

Referral to a clinical radiologist is the prime means of communication between the referrer and the radiologist. Current Australian and New Zealand government regulations do not prescribe what clinical information should be included in a referral. This work presents a qualitative compilation of clinical radiologist opinion, relevant professional recommendations, governmental regulatory positions and prior work on diagnostic error to synthesise recommendations on what clinical information should be included in a referral. Recommended requirements on what clinical information should be included in a referral to a clinical radiologist are as follows: an unambiguous referral; identity of the patient; identity of the referrer; and sufficient clinical detail to justify performance of the diagnostic imaging examination and to confirm appropriate choice of the examination and modality. Recommended guideline on the content of clinical detail clarifies when the information provided in a referral meets these requirements. High-quality information provided in a referral allows the clinical radiologist to ensure that exposure of patients to medical radiation is justified. It also minimises the incidence of perceptual and interpretational diagnostic error. Recommended requirements and guideline on the clinical detail to be provided in a referral to a clinical radiologist have been formulated for professional debate and adoption.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical information; diagnostic imaging; imaging request; quality assurance; quality of referral

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28139044     DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  5 in total

1.  The value of referral information and assessment - a cross sectional study of radiographers' perceptions.

Authors:  Catherine Chilute Chilanga; Hilde Merete Olerud; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Bayesian Approach to Predicting Acute Appendicitis Using Ultrasonographic and Clinical Variables in Children.

Authors:  Tristan Reddan; Jonathan Corness; Fiona Harden; Wenbiao Hu; Kerrie Mengersen
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2019-07-31

3.  Using text analysis software to identify determinants of inappropriate clinical question reporting and diagnostic procedure referrals in Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Venturelli; Marta Ottone; Fabio Pignatti; Eletta Bellocchio; Mirco Pinotti; Giulia Besutti; Olivera Djuric; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Radiographers' actions and challenges when confronted with inappropriate radiology referrals.

Authors:  Catherine Chilute Chilanga; Hilde Merete Olerud; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists.

Authors:  Vincent Khou; Angelica Ly; Lindsay Moore; Maria Markoulli; Michael Kalloniatis; Michael Yapp; Michael Hennessy; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.