Literature DB >> 28138782

Clinical classes of injured workers with chronic low back pain: a latent class analysis with relationship to working status.

Lisa C Carlesso1,2, Y Raja Rampersaud3, Aileen M Davis4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine (a) clinical classes of injured workers with chronic low back pain (CLBP), (b) predictors of class membership and (c) associations of classes with baseline work status.
METHODS: Patients with CLBP from a tertiary care outpatient clinic in Toronto, Canada were sampled. Latent class analysis was applied to determine class structure using physical, psychological and coping indicators. Classes were interpreted by class-specific means and analyzed for predictors of membership. Lastly, association of the classes with being off work was modeled.
RESULTS: A 3-class model was chosen based on fit criteria, theoretical and clinical knowledge of this population. The resultant 3 classes represented low, moderate and high levels of clinical severity. Predictors of being in the high severity group compared to the low severity group were < high school education [odds ratio (OR) 3.06, 95% CI (1.47, 6.37)] and comorbidity total [OR 1.28, 95% CI (1.03, 1.59)]. High severity class membership was associated with four times increased risk of being off work at baseline compared to those in the low severity group [OR 3.98, 95% CI (1.61, 6.34)].
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of injured workers with CLBP, 3 clinical classes were identified with distinct psychological and physical profiles. These profiles are useful in aiding clinicians to identify patients of high clinical severity who may be potentially at risk for problematic return to work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical classes; Latent variable mixture model; Low back injury; Workers

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28138782     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-4966-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

Review 1.  An updated overview of clinical guidelines for chronic low back pain management in primary care.

Authors:  Paolo Pillastrini; Ivan Gardenghi; Francesca Bonetti; Francesco Capra; Andrew Guccione; Raffaele Mugnai; Francesco S Violante
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Emotional Labor: Links to Depression and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Call Center Workers.

Authors:  Hye-Jin Kim; Jina Choo
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.413

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Somatosensory nociceptive characteristics differentiate subgroups in people with chronic low back pain: a cluster analysis.

Authors:  Martin Rabey; Helen Slater; Peter O'Sullivan; Darren Beales; Anne Smith
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  The recovery patterns of back pain among workers with compensated occupational back injuries.

Authors:  Cynthia Chen; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Peter Smith
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Primary care research priorities in low back pain: an update.

Authors:  Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa; Bart W Koes; Glenn Pransky; Jeffrey Borkan; Christopher G Maher; Rob J E M Smeets
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

Authors:  A Osman; F X Barrios; B A Kopper; W Hauptmann; J Jones; E O'Neill
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1997-12

8.  Characterizing the course of low back pain: a latent class analysis.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Kelvin Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases.

Authors:  Marjorie L Baldwin
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 10.  Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Samra Mian; Tetyana Kendzerska; Melissa French
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring pain phenotypes in workers with chronic low back pain: Application of IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Lisa C Carlesso; Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; William Shaw; Christian Larivière; Manon Choinière
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2021-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.