Literature DB >> 2813794

Intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation with selective MR angiography and venography.

R R Edelman1, K U Wentz, H P Mattle, G V O'Reilly, G Candia, C Liu, B Zhao, R N Kjellberg, K R Davis.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and spin-echo methods were used to evaluate intracerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in 10 patients. Spin-echo images obtained with flow presaturation demonstrated the nidus of the AVM in all cases, but it was difficult to determine feeding vessels. These vessels were directly visualized with three-dimensional MR angiography; their presence could be indirectly determined by means of selective presaturation of individual vessels, which resulted in a marked decrease in signal within the portion of the AVM supplied by that vessel. Vascular supplies from the internal carotid artery and anterior, middle, or posterior cerebral arteries were detected in all cases, but in three large malformations it was not possible to demonstrate small feeding vessels. MR angiograms were also helpful for further defining the nidus. The combination of MR angiographic and spin-echo methods provides information useful for therapeutic planning not provided by either technique alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2813794     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Selective magnetic resonance angiography of the head.

Authors:  H P Mattle; K U Wentz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Stereoscopic display of MR angiograms.

Authors:  K U Wentz; H P Mattle; R R Edelman; J Kleefield; G V O'Reilly; C Liu; B Zhao
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  F Nüssel; H Wegmüller; P Huber
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography with 6.4-fold sensitivity encoding at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Clifton R Haider; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Usefulness of three-dimensional phase contrast MR angiography on arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  B Pant; M Sumida; K Arita; A Tominaga; F Ikawa; K Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Contrast-enhanced MRA for investigation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  M Suzuki; O Matsui; K Kobayashi; F Ueda; C Saitoh; A Katagiri; J Sanada; M Tawara; N Terayama; H Kawashima; S Kida; J Yamashita
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Magnetic resonance angiography of supratentorial tumours: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  G Wilms; H Bosmans; G Marchal; P Demaerel; J Goffin; C Plets; A L Baert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Venous angiomas: plain and contrast-enhanced MRI and MR angiography.

Authors:  M Crecco; R Floris; A Vidiri; E Squillaci; G L Sergiacomi; M Mattioli; G Simonetti; S Squillaci
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  [Multimodal magnetic resonance diagnostics of arteriovenous malformations].

Authors:  M Essig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Intracranial magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  P M Ruggieri; T J Masaryk; J S Ross; M T Modic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.