Wei-Wei He1, Ming-Jie Kuang2, Jie Zhao3, Lei Sun4, Bin Lu5, Ying Wang6, Jian-Xiong Ma7, Xin-Long Ma8. 1. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China; Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: 2010021204@tmu.edu.cn. 2. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China; Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: doctorkmj@tmu.edu.cn. 3. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China; Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: zhaoj_91@163.com. 4. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: sunleigys@163.com. 5. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: 578794146@qq.com. 6. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: 337533607@qq.com. 7. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: mbiomechanics@126.com. 8. Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China; Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: maxinlong432@sina.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A meta analysis to compare efficacy and safety of intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) and intraarticular corticosteroids (CS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHOD: Potential studies were searched from the electronic databases included PubMed, Embase, web of science and the Cochrane Library up to August 2016. High quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected based on inclusion criteria. RevMan 5.3 were used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: 12 RCTs containing 1794 patients meet the inclusion criteria. Visual analog scale (VAS) score in CS group decrease more than HA group up to 1 month (p = 0.03) and it shows equal efficacy at 3 months (p = 0.29); HA is more effective than CS at 6 months (p = 0.006). To Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, there is no significant difference for two groups at 3 months (p = 0.29); HA shows greater relative effect than CS at 6 months (p = 0.005). No significant difference is found on proportion of rescue medication use after initiation of treatment (p = 0.58) and proportion of withdrawal for knee pain (p = 0.54). HA and CS exhibit equal efficacy on improvement of active range of knee flexion at 3 months (p = 0.73) and 6 months (p = 0.43). More topical adverse effects occurred in intraarticular HA group when compared with intraarticular CS group. CONCLUSION: Intraarticular CS is more effective on pain relief than intraarticular HA in short term (up to 1 month), while HA is more effective in long term (up to 6 months). Two therapies benefit similarly for knee function improvement. Both two methods are relatively safe, but intraarticular HA causes more topical adverse effects compared with intraarticular CS.
OBJECTIVE: A meta analysis to compare efficacy and safety of intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) and intraarticular corticosteroids (CS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHOD: Potential studies were searched from the electronic databases included PubMed, Embase, web of science and the Cochrane Library up to August 2016. High quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected based on inclusion criteria. RevMan 5.3 were used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: 12 RCTs containing 1794 patients meet the inclusion criteria. Visual analog scale (VAS) score in CS group decrease more than HA group up to 1 month (p = 0.03) and it shows equal efficacy at 3 months (p = 0.29); HA is more effective than CS at 6 months (p = 0.006). To Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, there is no significant difference for two groups at 3 months (p = 0.29); HA shows greater relative effect than CS at 6 months (p = 0.005). No significant difference is found on proportion of rescue medication use after initiation of treatment (p = 0.58) and proportion of withdrawal for knee pain (p = 0.54). HA and CS exhibit equal efficacy on improvement of active range of knee flexion at 3 months (p = 0.73) and 6 months (p = 0.43). More topical adverse effects occurred in intraarticular HA group when compared with intraarticular CS group. CONCLUSION: Intraarticular CS is more effective on pain relief than intraarticular HA in short term (up to 1 month), while HA is more effective in long term (up to 6 months). Two therapies benefit similarly for knee function improvement. Both two methods are relatively safe, but intraarticular HA causes more topical adverse effects compared with intraarticular CS.
Authors: Oğuz Kaya; Ahmet Şenel; Ömer Cihan Batur; Nevzat Gönder; Emre Ergen; Barış Peker Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 1.033