Literature DB >> 28135636

Phasic valence and arousal do not influence post-conflict adjustments in the Simon task.

David Dignath1, Markus Janczyk2, Andreas B Eder3.   

Abstract

According to theoretical accounts of cognitive control, conflict between competing responses is monitored and triggers post conflict behavioural adjustments. Some models proposed that conflict is detected as an affective signal. While the conflict monitoring theory assumed that conflict is registered as a negative valence signal, the adaptation by binding model hypothesized that conflict provides a high arousal signal. The present research induced phasic affect in a Simon task with presentations of pleasant and unpleasant pictures that were high or low in arousal. If conflict is registered as an affective signal, the presentation of a corresponding affective signal should potentiate post conflict adjustments. Results did not support the hypothesis, and Bayesian analyses corroborated the conclusion that phasic affects do not influence post conflict behavioural adjustments in the Simon task.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cognition-emotion interaction; Cognitive control; Conflict; Gratton effect; Sequential congruency effect; Simon task; Valence and arousal interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28135636     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  6 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring and control in multitasking.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; David Dignath; Marco Steinhauser; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Carlos Ventura-Bort; Alfons Hamm; Mathias Weymar
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Induced affective states do not modulate effort avoidance.

Authors:  Carlos González-García; Beatriz García-Carrión; Raúl López-Benítez; Alberto Sobrado; Alberto Acosta; María Ruz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-02-08

Review 4.  Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder; Marco Steinhauser; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

5.  Dynamic adjustments in working memory in the face of affective interference.

Authors:  J E Witkin; A P Zanesco; E Denkova; A P Jha
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

6.  The face of control: Corrugator supercilii tracks aversive conflict signals in the service of adaptive cognitive control.

Authors:  Anja Berger; Vanessa Mitschke; David Dignath; Andreas Eder; Henk van Steenbergen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.016

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.