Literature DB >> 28135143

Italian, Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Study of Cisplatin Plus Etoposide With or Without Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The GOIRC-AIFA FARM6PMFJM Trial.

Marcello Tiseo1, Luca Boni1, Francesca Ambrosio1, Andrea Camerini1, Editta Baldini1, Saverio Cinieri1, Matteo Brighenti1, Francesca Zanelli1, Efisio Defraia1, Rita Chiari1, Claudio Dazzi1, Carmelo Tibaldi1, Gianni Michele Turolla1, Vito D'Alessandro1, Nicoletta Zilembo1, Anna Rita Trolese1, Francesco Grossi1, Ferdinando Riccardi1, Andrea Ardizzoni1.   

Abstract

Purpose Considering promising results in phase II studies, a randomized phase III trial was designed to assess the efficacy of adding bevacizumab to first-line cisplatin plus etoposide for treatment of extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and Methods Treatment-naive patients with ED-SCLC were randomly assigned to receive either cisplatin plus etoposide (arm A) or the same regimen with bevacizumab (arm B) for a maximum of six courses. In the absence of progression, patients in arm B continued bevacizumab alone until disease progression or for a maximum of 18 courses. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Two hundred four patients were randomly assigned and considered in intent-to-treat analyses (103 patients in arm A and 101 patients in arm B). At a median follow-up of 34.9 months in arm A and arm B, median OS times were 8.9 and 9.8 months, and 1-year survival rates were 25% and 37% (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.06; P = .113), respectively. A statistically significant effect of bevacizumab on OS in patients who received maintenance was seen (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.91; P = .011). Median progression-free survival times were 5.7 and 6.7 months in arm A and arm B, respectively ( P = .030). Regarding hematologic toxicity, no statistically significant differences were observed; for nonhematologic toxicity, only hypertension was more frequent in arm B (grade 3 or 4, 1.0% v 6.3% in arms A v B, respectively; P = .057). Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin and etoposide in the first-line treatment of ED-SCLC had an acceptable toxicity profile and led to a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival, which, however, did not translate into a statistically significant increase in OS. Further research with novel antiangiogenic agents, particularly in the maintenance setting, is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28135143     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  58 in total

1.  Another disappointing result, but how good is it?

Authors:  Yasushi Goto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Is the door open to further investigation with antiangiogenesis in SCLC?

Authors:  Marcello Tiseo; Luca Boni; Andrea Ardizzoni
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  No room for statins in the quest for survival benefits in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Facchinetti; Marcello Tiseo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

4.  Bevacizumab in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Giandomenico Roviello; Navid Sobhani; Daniele Generali
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

5.  The underreporting of phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data of older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Beverly Canin; Ira Parker; Amy R MacKenzie; Thuy Koll; Ritika Vankina; Christine D Hsu; Brian Jang; Kathy Pan; Jennifer L Lund; Edith Starbuck; Armin Shahrokni
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 6.  Dashing Decades of Defeat: Long Anticipated Advances in the First-line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Samantha A Armstrong; Stephen V Liu
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Immune-related adverse events on body CT in patients with small-cell lung cancer treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Hyesun Park; Hiroto Hatabu; Biagio Ricciuti; Safiya J Aijazi; Mark M Awad; Mizuki Nishino
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Current standards for clinical management of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Anna F Farago; Florence K Keane
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02

9.  The effect of post-progression survival on overall survival among patients with sensitive relapse of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Miura; Hisao Imai; Reiko Sakurai; Kyoichi Kaira; Noriaki Sunaga; Koichi Minato; Ryusei Saito; Takeshi Hisada
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Genomic and Functional Fidelity of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Benjamin J Drapkin; Julie George; Camilla L Christensen; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Ruben Dries; Tilak Sundaresan; Sarah Phat; David T Myers; Jun Zhong; Peter Igo; Mehlika H Hazar-Rethinam; Joseph A Licausi; Maria Gomez-Caraballo; Marina Kem; Kandarp N Jani; Roxana Azimi; Nima Abedpour; Roopika Menon; Sotirios Lakis; Rebecca S Heist; Reinhard Büttner; Stefan Haas; Lecia V Sequist; Alice T Shaw; Kwok-Kin Wong; Aaron N Hata; Mehmet Toner; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daniel A Haber; Martin Peifer; Nicholas Dyson; Roman K Thomas; Anna F Farago
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 39.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.