Literature DB >> 28135140

Promoting End-of-Life Discussions in Advanced Cancer: Effects of Patient Coaching and Question Prompt Lists.

Rachel A Rodenbach1, Kim Brandes1, Kevin Fiscella1, Richard L Kravitz1, Phyllis N Butow1, Adam Walczak1, Paul R Duberstein1, Peter Sullivan1, Beth Hoh1, Guibo Xing1, Sandy Plumb1, Ronald M Epstein1.   

Abstract

Purpose To build on results of a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a combined patient-oncologist intervention to improve communication in advanced cancer, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the patient intervention component, a previsit patient coaching session that used a question prompt list (QPL). We hypothesized that intervention-group participants would bring up more QPL-related topics, particularly prognosis-related topics, during the subsequent oncologist visit. Patients and Methods This cluster RCT with 170 patients who had advanced nonhematologic cancer (and their caregivers) recruited from practices of 24 participating oncologists in western New York. Intervention-group oncologists (n = 12) received individualized communication training; up to 10 of their patients (n = 84) received a previsit individualized communication coaching session that incorporated a QPL. Control-group oncologists (n = 12) and patients (n = 86) received no interventions. Topics of interest identified by patients during the coaching session were summarized from coaching notes; one office visit after the coaching session was audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by using linear regression modeling for group differences. Results Compared with controls, more than twice as many intervention-group participants brought up QPL-related topics during their office visits (70.2% v 32.6%; P < .001). Patients in the intervention group were nearly three times more likely to ask about prognosis (16.7% v 5.8%; P =.03). Of 262 topics of interest identified during coaching, 158 (60.3%) were QPL related; 20 (12.7%) addressed prognosis. Overall, patients in the intervention group brought up 82.4% of topics of interest during the office visit. Conclusion A combined coaching and QPL intervention was effective to help patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers identify and bring up topics of concern, including prognosis, during their subsequent oncologist visits. Considering that most patients are misinformed about prognosis, more intensive steps are needed to better promote such discussions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28135140      PMCID: PMC5455683          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Lesley Fallowfield; Sarah Ford; Shon Lewis
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  A M The; T Hak; G Koëter; G van Der Wal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

3.  Can a "prompt list" empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions?

Authors:  Aneta Dimoska; Martin H N Tattersall; Phyllis N Butow; Heather Shepherd; Paul Kinnersley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study.

Authors:  G M Leydon; M Boulton; C Moynihan; A Jones; J Mossman; M Boudioni; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

5.  Information needs in terminal illness.

Authors:  J S Kutner; J F Steiner; K K Corbett; D W Jahnigen; P L Barton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care.

Authors:  Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Sonal Admane; Emily R Gallagher; Vicki A Jackson; Thomas J Lynch; Inga T Lennes; Connie M Dahlin; William F Pirl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support.

Authors:  P N Butow; M Maclean; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall; M J Boyer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Perspectives on care at the close of life. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: addressing the "elephant in the room".

Authors:  T E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Paul J Catalano; Angel Cronin; Matthew D Finkelman; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A qualitative analysis of responses to a question prompt list and prognosis and end-of-life care discussion prompts delivered in a communication support program.

Authors:  Adam Walczak; Inge Henselmans; Martin H N Tattersall; Josephine M Clayton; Patricia M Davidson; Jane Young; Frances A Bellemore; Ronald M Epstein; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  22 in total

1.  Effects of the Values and Options in Cancer Care Communication Intervention on Personal Caregiver Experiences of Cancer Care and Bereavement Outcomes.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Paul K Maciejewski; Ronald M Epstein; Joshua J Fenton; Benjamin Chapman; Sally A Norton; Michael Hoerger; Marsha N Wittink; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Supriya Mohile; Richard L Kravitz; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  [Quality assurance in specialized palliative home care (QUAPS): a questionnaire's feasibility].

Authors:  D Berghaus; A Schütz; U Hammer; E Gaser; U Wedding; W Meißner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  A stakeholder-driven approach to improve the informed consent process for palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Jennifer K Wind; Elizabeth Frank; Nadine J McCleary; Laura Porter; Heather Cushing; Caroline Abbott; Christine Cronin; Peter C Enzinger; Neal J Meropol; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-03-22

Review 4.  Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Authors:  Rebecca E Ryan; Michael Connolly; Natalie K Bradford; Simon Henderson; Anthony Herbert; Lina Schonfeld; Jeanine Young; Josephine I Bothroyd; Amanda Henderson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-08

5.  Quality versus quantity in end-of-life choices of cancer patients and support persons: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Scott D Brown; Laura Wall; Justin Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Development and validation of the Therapy Preference Scale to understand patients´ systemic cancer treatment preferences.

Authors:  Vijaya Raj Bhatt; Prajwal Dhakal; Christopher S Wichman; Bunny Pozehl
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion.

Authors:  Marsa Gholamzadeh; Hamidreza Abtahi; Marjan Ghazisaeeidi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryan D McMahan; Ismael Tellez; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Perceptions of prognosis and goal of treatment in patients with malignant gliomas and their caregivers.

Authors:  Deborah A Forst; Kit Quain; Sophia L Landay; Maya Anand; Emilia Kaslow-Zieve; Michelle M Mesa; Jamie M Jacobs; Jorg Dietrich; Michael W Parsons; Nora Horick; Joseph A Greer; Tracy T Batchelor; Vicki A Jackson; Areej El-Jawahri; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-04-17

Review 10.  Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.

Authors:  Philippa M Moore; Solange Rivera; Gonzalo A Bravo-Soto; Camila Olivares; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.