Literature DB >> 28134721

Research in Nursing and Nutrition: Is Randomized Clinical Trial the Actual Gold Standard?

Ileana Baldi1, Nicola Soriani, Giulia Lorenzoni, Danila Azzolina, Elisa Dal Lago, Sara De Bardi, Elvira Verduci, Renzo Zanotti, Dario Gregori.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of reporting of nurse-driven randomized controlled trials involving a direct nutritional intervention. A bibliometric search for randomized controlled trials involving a direct nutritional intervention from 1991 to 2011 in nursing research was conducted. Both quality of the study and design aspects were evaluated. The prevalent randomized controlled trial design used is 2-arm parallel, individual, and randomized with a continuous primary endpoint. Global numbers of randomized controlled trials and the proportion of good-quality randomized controlled trials began a steady and marked rise, more than doubling, from the 1990s to about 2001 and increased slowly thereafter. Studies are overall sufficiently well designed, although there is still room for quality improvement. Additionally, implementation of new randomized controlled trial designs exists and should be advocated.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28134721     DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs        ISSN: 1042-895X            Impact factor:   0.978


  1 in total

1.  High Agreement and High Prevalence: The Paradox of Cohen's Kappa.

Authors:  Slavica Zec; Nicola Soriani; Rosanna Comoretto; Ileana Baldi
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2017-10-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.