Literature DB >> 28134452

Neural-Symbolic Machine Learning for Retrosynthesis and Reaction Prediction.

Marwin H S Segler1, Mark P Waller1,2.   

Abstract

Reaction prediction and retrosynthesis are the cornerstones of organic chemistry. Rule-based expert systems have been the most widespread approach to computationally solve these two related challenges to date. However, reaction rules often fail because they ignore the molecular context, which leads to reactivity conflicts. Herein, we report that deep neural networks can learn to resolve reactivity conflicts and to prioritize the most suitable transformation rules. We show that by training our model on 3.5 million reactions taken from the collective published knowledge of the entire discipline of chemistry, our model exhibits a top10-accuracy of 95 % in retrosynthesis and 97 % for reaction prediction on a validation set of almost 1 million reactions.
© 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; machine learning; retrosynthesis; synthesis design; total synthesis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28134452     DOI: 10.1002/chem.201605499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.236


  59 in total

Review 1.  QSAR without borders.

Authors:  Eugene N Muratov; Jürgen Bajorath; Robert P Sheridan; Igor V Tetko; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov; Tudor I Oprea; Igor I Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Adrian Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev; Stefano Curtarolo; Denis Fourches; Yoram Cohen; Alan Aspuru-Guzik; David A Winkler; Dimitris Agrafiotis; Artem Cherkasov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Finding the K best synthesis plans.

Authors:  Rolf Fagerberg; Christoph Flamm; Rojin Kianian; Daniel Merkle; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.514

3.  "Found in Translation": predicting outcomes of complex organic chemistry reactions using neural sequence-to-sequence models.

Authors:  Philippe Schwaller; Théophile Gaudin; Dávid Lányi; Costas Bekas; Teodoro Laino
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 4.  The Molecular Industrial Revolution: Automated Synthesis of Small Molecules.

Authors:  Melanie Trobe; Martin D Burke
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI.

Authors:  Marwin H S Segler; Mike Preuss; Mark P Waller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  What Does the Machine Learn? Knowledge Representations of Chemical Reactivity.

Authors:  Joshua A Kammeraad; Jack Goetz; Eric A Walker; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Learning To Predict Reaction Conditions: Relationships between Solvent, Molecular Structure, and Catalyst.

Authors:  Eric Walker; Joshua Kammeraad; Jonathan Goetz; Michael T Robo; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  Applications of artificial intelligence to drug design and discovery in the big data era: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Neetu Tripathi; Manoj Kumar Goshisht; Sanat Kumar Sahu; Charu Arora
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 9.  Machine learning for molecular and materials science.

Authors:  Keith T Butler; Daniel W Davies; Hugh Cartwright; Olexandr Isayev; Aron Walsh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Evaluating and clustering retrosynthesis pathways with learned strategy.

Authors:  Yiming Mo; Yanfei Guan; Pritha Verma; Jiang Guo; Mike E Fortunato; Zhaohong Lu; Connor W Coley; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.