Maile Y Karris1, Sonia Jain2, Tyler R C Day3, Josué Pérez-Santiago1, Miguel Goicoechea4, Michael P Dubé5, Xiaoying Sun2, Celsa Spina6, Eric S Daar7,8, Richard H Haubrich9, Sheldon Morris1,2. 1. a Department of Medicine , University California San Diego , San Diego , CA , USA. 2. b Department of Family and Preventive Medicine , University California San Diego , San Diego , CA , USA. 3. c Department of Medicine , Washington University , Saint Louis , MO , USA. 4. d Department of Medicine , Scripps Health San Diego , CA , USA. 5. e Department of Medicine , University Southern California Keck School of Medicine , Los Angeles , CA , USA. 6. f Department of Pathology , Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System , San Diego , CA , USA. 7. g Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute , Harbor-UCLA Medical Center , Los Angeles , CA , USA. 8. h David Geffen School of Medicine , UCLA , Los Angeles , CA , USA. 9. i Gilead Sciences , Forest city , CA , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens may potentially minimize antiretroviral (ART) toxicities, but demonstrate mixed efficacy and toxicity results. The impact of an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and protease inhibitor (PI) regimen on HIV viral dynamics and T cell kinetics remains underdescribed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of raltegravir + ritonavir boosted lopinavir (RAL + LPV/r) to efavirenz/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (EFV/TDF/FTC) on HIV kinetics and T cell dynamics. METHODS:Fifty participants naïve to ART underwent HIV viral kinetic sampling evaluated using biexponential mixed effects modeling. A subset of 28 subjects (with complete viral suppression) underwent flow cytometry and evaluation of soluble markers of inflammation at weeks 0, 4, and 48 of ART. RESULTS: RAL + LPV/r compared to EFV/TDF/FTC resulted in a prolonged first phase viral decay rate (18 vs. 13 days p < 0.01). From weeks 0 to 4, RAL + LPV/r was associated with a trend toward greater decreases in activated CD4+ T cells (-3.81 vs. -1.18 p = 0.09) and less decreases in activated effector memory CD4+ T cells (-0.63 vs. -2.69 p-0.07). These trends did not persist to week 48. No differences were noted at any time point for soluble markers of immune activation. CONCLUSIONS: The prolonged first phase viral decay observed with RAL + LPV/r in persons starting ART did not result in differences in viral suppression at week 48. We also observed trends in declines in certain cellular markers of immune activation but it remains unclear if this could translate to long-term immunologic benefits in persons on an INSTI + PI.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens may potentially minimize antiretroviral (ART) toxicities, but demonstrate mixed efficacy and toxicity results. The impact of an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and protease inhibitor (PI) regimen on HIV viral dynamics and T cell kinetics remains underdescribed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of raltegravir + ritonavir boosted lopinavir (RAL + LPV/r) to efavirenz/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (EFV/TDF/FTC) on HIV kinetics and T cell dynamics. METHODS: Fifty participants naïve to ART underwent HIV viral kinetic sampling evaluated using biexponential mixed effects modeling. A subset of 28 subjects (with complete viral suppression) underwent flow cytometry and evaluation of soluble markers of inflammation at weeks 0, 4, and 48 of ART. RESULTS:RAL + LPV/r compared to EFV/TDF/FTC resulted in a prolonged first phase viral decay rate (18 vs. 13 days p < 0.01). From weeks 0 to 4, RAL + LPV/r was associated with a trend toward greater decreases in activated CD4+ T cells (-3.81 vs. -1.18 p = 0.09) and less decreases in activated effector memory CD4+ T cells (-0.63 vs. -2.69 p-0.07). These trends did not persist to week 48. No differences were noted at any time point for soluble markers of immune activation. CONCLUSIONS: The prolonged first phase viral decay observed with RAL + LPV/r in persons starting ART did not result in differences in viral suppression at week 48. We also observed trends in declines in certain cellular markers of immune activation but it remains unclear if this could translate to long-term immunologic benefits in persons on an INSTI + PI.
Authors: M A Valantin; E Lanoy; M Bentata; O Kalmykova; A Boutekadjirt; C Allavena; W Rozenbaum; G Peytavin; B Amellal; V Calvez; D Costagliola; C Katlama Journal: HIV Med Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Richard H Haubrich; Sharon A Riddler; Heather Ribaudo; Gregory Direnzo; Karin L Klingman; Kevin W Garren; David L Butcher; James F Rooney; Diane V Havlir; John W Mellors Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Babafemi Taiwo; Lu Zheng; Sebastien Gallien; Roy M Matining; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Cara C Wilson; Baiba I Berzins; Edward P Acosta; Barbara Bastow; Peter S Kim; Joseph J Eron Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-11-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Maile Y Karris; Sonia Jain; Vi Q Bowman; Gunter Rieg; Miguel Goicoechea; Michael P Dube; Shubha Kerkar; Carol Kemper; Catherine Diamond; Xiaoying Sun; Eric S Daar; Richard H Haubrich; Sheldon Morris Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: M A Boyd; N Kumarasamy; C L Moore; C Nwizu; M H Losso; L Mohapi; A Martin; S Kerr; A H Sohn; H Teppler; O Van de Steen; J-M Molina; S Emery; D A Cooper Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Julia L Marcus; Romain S Neugebauer; Wendy A Leyden; Chun R Chao; Lanfang Xu; Charles P Quesenberry; Daniel B Klein; William J Towner; Michael A Horberg; Michael J Silverberg Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Richard H Haubrich; Sharon A Riddler; A Gregory DiRienzo; Lauren Komarow; William G Powderly; Karin Klingman; Kevin W Garren; David L Butcher; James F Rooney; David W Haas; John W Mellors; Diane V Havlir Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jose I Bernardino; Amanda Mocroft; Patrick W Mallon; Cedrick Wallet; Jan Gerstoft; Charlotte Russell; Peter Reiss; Christine Katlama; Stephane De Wit; Laura Richert; Abdel Babiker; Antonio Buño; Antonella Castagna; Pierre-Marie Girard; Genevieve Chene; Francois Raffi; Jose R Arribas Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Caroline A Sabin; Peter Reiss; Lene Ryom; Andrew N Phillips; Rainer Weber; Matthew Law; Eric Fontas; Amanda Mocroft; Stephane de Wit; Colette Smith; Francois Dabis; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Wafaa El-Sadr; Jens D Lundgren Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 8.775