Literature DB >> 28133749

Depth-dependent concentrations of hematopoietic stem cells in the adult skeleton: Implications for active marrow dosimetry.

Amy M Geyer1, Bryan C Schwarz1, Shannon E O'Reilly1, Robert F Hobbs2, George Sgouros3, Wesley E Bolch1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The hematopoietically active (or red) bone marrow is the target tissue assigned in skeletal dosimetry models for assessment of stochastic effects (leukemia induction) as well as tissue reactions (marrow toxicity). Active marrow, however, is in reality a surrogate tissue region for specific cell populations, namely the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Present models of active marrow dosimetry implicitly assume that these cells are uniformly localized throughout the marrow spaces of trabecular spongiosa. Data from Watchman et al. and Bourke et al., however, clearly indicate that there is a substantial spatial concentration gradient of these cells with the highest concentrations localized near the bone trabeculae surfaces. The purpose of the present study was thus to explore the dosimetric implications of these spatial gradients on active marrow dosimetry.
METHODS: Images of several bone sites from a 45-yr female were retagged to group active marrow voxels into 50 μm increments of marrow depth, after which electron and alpha-particle depth-dependent specific absorbed fractions were computed for four source tissues - active marrow, inactive marrow, bone trabeculae volumes, and bone trabeculae surfaces. Corresponding depth-dependent S values (dose to a target tissue per decay in a source tissue) were computed and further weighted by the relative target cell concentration. These depth-weighted radionuclide S values were systematically compared to the more traditional volume-averaged radionuclide S values of the MIRD schema for both individual bones of the skeleton and their skeletal-averaged quantities.
RESULTS: For both beta-emitters and alpha-emitters localized in the active and inactive marrow, depth-weighted S values were shown to differ from volume-averaged S values by only a few percent, as dose gradients across the marrow tissues are nonexistent. For bone volume and bone surface sources of alpha-emitters and lower energy beta-emitters, when marrow dose gradients are expected, explicit consideration of target cell spatial concentration gradients are shown to significantly impact marrow dosimetry.
CONCLUSIONS: For medical isotopes currently utilized for treatment of skeletal metastases, namely 153 Sm and 223 Ra, accounting for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell concentration gradients resulted in maximum percent differences to reference skeletal-averaged S values of ~21% and 55%, respectively.
© 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hematopoietic stem cell; marrow dosimetry; molecular radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28133749      PMCID: PMC6385882          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  35 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and status of bone and marrow dose models.

Authors:  M G Stabin; K F Eckerman; W E Bolch; L G Bouchet; P W Patton
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.099

2.  Adipocyte spatial distributions in bone marrow: implications for skeletal dosimetry models.

Authors:  Amish P Shah; Phillip W Patton; Didier A Rajon; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment.

Authors:  Michael G Stabin; Jeffry A Siegel
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Skeletal dosimetry in the MAX06 and the FAX06 phantoms for external exposure to photons based on vertebral 3D-microCT images.

Authors:  R Kramer; H J Khoury; J W Vieira; I Kawrakow
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Spatial distribution of blood vessels and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells within the marrow cavities of human cancellous bone.

Authors:  Christopher J Watchman; Vincent A Bourke; Jared R Lyon; Andrea E Knowlton; Samantha L Butler; David D Grier; John R Wingard; Raul C Braylan; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Calculated beta-ray dose factors for trabecular bone.

Authors:  J R Whitwell; F W Spiers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Novel functions of the CD34 family.

Authors:  Julie S Nielsen; Kelly M McNagny
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Human alimentary tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication 100. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2006

9.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. A report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals. ICRP Publication 89.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2002

10.  Skeletal dosimetry for external exposure to photons based on microCT images of spongiosa from different bone sites.

Authors:  R Kramer; H J Khoury; J W Vieira; I Kawrakow
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Imaging and dosimetry for alpha-particle emitter radiopharmaceutical therapy: improving radiopharmaceutical therapy by looking into the black box.

Authors:  George Sgouros; Eric Frey; Yong Du; Rob Hobbs; Wesley Bolch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Active bone marrow S-values for the low-energy electron emitter terbium-161 compared to S-values for lutetium-177 and yttrium-90.

Authors:  Jens Hemmingsson; Johanna Svensson; Nicholas P van der Meulen; Cristina Müller; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.