Literature DB >> 28132228

O024. Transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation enhances somatosensory thalamic activity in migraine between attacks: a central mechanism of clinical efficacy?

Davide Di Lenola1, Gianluca Coppola2, Mariano Serrao3, Cherubino Di Lorenzo4, Francesco Pierelli3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 28132228      PMCID: PMC4759145          DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-16-S1-A160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Headache Pain        ISSN: 1129-2369            Impact factor:   7.277


× No keyword cloud information.

Background

In a recent randomized double-blind sham-controlled study the Cefaly®, a novel transcutaneous supraorbital electrostimulation device, has been successfully used as a prophylactic treatment for episodic migraine. The possible mechanisms of action through which the device is able to induce clinical improvement in migraine are not known. In the present study, we investigated whether Cefaly® may act centrally at the thalamocortical/cortical level.

Methods

To explore the central mechanisms of action of Cefaly®, we recorded the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) before, and in the subsequent two times after one session of supraorbital stimulation lasting 20 min in 10 migraine without aura patients between attacks. We measured the N20-P25 amplitudes on the low-frequency-SSEP, and, after applying a band-pass filter (450-750 Hz), maximal peak-to-peak amplitudes of the pre-synaptic, reflecting thalamocortical activity, and post-synaptic, reflecting primary cortical activation, high-frequency oscillations (HFOs).

Results

Pre-synaptic HFO amplitudes, reflecting somatosensory thalamocortical activity, significantly increased after the stimulation (from 0.035 V to 0.058 V, p < 0.01), whereas both the low-frequency N20 SSEP component and post-synaptic HFOs were unaffected.

Conclusions

Present data might support the hypothesis that Cefaly® acts centrally through increased thalamocortical activity induced by the neurostimulation. It is of obvious interest to verify whether these device-induced changes might persist in the long-term after 3-month daily preventive stimulation, and if they follow clinical improvement. Written informed consent to publish was obtained from the patient(s).
  2 in total

1.  Erratum to: 1st Joint ANIRCEF-SISC Congress (meeting abstracts).

Authors:  Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 2.  Neuromodulation for Chronic Daily Headache.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Delphine Magis; Francesco Casillo; Gabriele Sebastianelli; Chiara Abagnale; Ettore Cioffi; Davide Di Lenola; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Mariano Serrao
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-02-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.