Literature DB >> 28132157

Evaluation of the treatment time-lag effect for survival data.

Kayoung Park1, Peihua Qiu2.   

Abstract

Medical treatments often take a period of time to reveal their impact on subjects, which is the so-called time-lag effect in the literature. In the survival data analysis literature, most existing methods compare two treatments in the entire study period. In cases when there is a substantial time-lag effect, these methods would not be effective in detecting the difference between the two treatments, because the similarity between the treatments during the time-lag period would diminish their effectiveness. In this paper, we develop a novel modeling approach for estimating the time-lag period and for comparing the two treatments properly after the time-lag effect is accommodated. Theoretical arguments and numerical examples show that it is effective in practice.

Keywords:  Cox proportional hazards model; Crossing hazard rates; Lag effect; Survival analysis; Treatment comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28132157     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-017-9390-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  5 in total

1.  Comparing two crossing hazard rates by Cox proportional hazards modelling.

Authors:  Kejian Liu; Peihua Qiu; Jun Sheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Confidence intervals for the first crossing point of two hazard functions.

Authors:  Ming-Yen Cheng; Peihua Qiu; Xianming Tan; Dongsheng Tu
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Model selection and diagnostics for joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data with crossing hazard rate functions.

Authors:  Ka Young Park; Peihua Qiu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Mantel-Haenszel analyses of litter-matched time-to-response data, with modifications for recovery of interlitter information.

Authors:  N Mantel; N R Bohidar; J L Ciminera
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Comparison of multiple hazard rate functions.

Authors:  Zhongxue Chen; Hanwen Huang; Peihua Qiu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Analysis From a Multicenter Registry.

Authors:  Manuel Almendro-Delia; Emilia Blanco-Ponce; Jesús Carmona-Carmona; J A Arboleda Sánchez; Juan Carlos Rodríguez Yáñez; José Manuel Soto Blanco; Isabel Fernández García; José M Castillo Caballero; Juan C García-Rubira; Rafael J Hidalgo-Urbano
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.