Literature DB >> 28132117

Evaluation of antimicrobial persistent activity of alcohol-based hand antiseptics against bacterial contamination.

R M López-Gigosos1, E Mariscal-López1, M Gutierrez-Bedmar1, A García-Rodriguez1, A Mariscal2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate persistent activity of three alcohol-based antiseptics widely used in the clinical routine containing chlorhexidine, triclosan or mecetronium after hand disinfection. Four tests were used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of antiseptics on: (i) resident microbiota; (ii) nutrient agar plates (NAP) subsequently inoculated with a test organism; and transient microbiota acquired by contact with dry hands (iii), or (iv) a wet inert surface that had been artificially contaminated. Four reference strains (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis) and an Acinetobacter baumannii strain responsible for a hospital outbreak were used as transient microbiota. Antimicrobial activity was calculated according to the CFUs reduction by reference to non-disinfected control hands. The antiseptics were applied according to European Standard EN1500. Solutions containing chlorhexidine or triclosan showed some persistent effects on transient microbiota on inert humid surfaces and NAP, but not on contaminated dry hands. Solutions containing mecetronium showed no persistent effect on transient flora in any of the trials. All alcohol-based antiseptics tested were more effective against resident flora than soap. No persistent activity was observed for A. baumannii in any of the trials. Chlorhexidine and triclosan are preferred when an antiseptic with persistent activity is desired, but a moist environment appears to be necessary for that antibacterial activity. Accordingly, relevant conclusions regarding the persistent activity of antiseptics for clinical practice and protection against bacterial contamination cannot be derived from this study for the alcoholic solutions tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28132117     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-2908-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  18 in total

Review 1.  Improving compliance with hand hygiene in hospitals.

Authors:  D Pittet
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  [Guidelines for the testing and evaluation of skin disinfectants].

Authors:  B Christiansen; H J Eggers; M Exner; K O Gundermann; P Heeg; V Hingst; U Höffler; J Krämer; H Martiny; H Rüden
Journal:  Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed       Date:  1991-09

3.  Substantive effect of chlorhexidine.

Authors:  J H Macias; S Ruiz; A E Macias; J A Alvarez
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Persistence of nosocomial bacteria on 2 biocidal fabrics based on silver under conditions of high relative humidity.

Authors:  Rosa López-Gigosos; Alberto Mariscal; Mario Gutierrez-Bedmar; Eloisa Mariscal-Lopez; Joaquín Fernández-Crehuet
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Chlorhexidine is a better antiseptic than povidone iodine and sodium hypochlorite because of its substantive effect.

Authors:  Juan H Macias; Virginia Arreguin; Juan M Munoz; Jose A Alvarez; Juan L Mosqueda; Alejandro E Macias
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 6.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Hand hygiene for the prevention of nosocomial infections.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Harald Löffler; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Measuring residual activity of topical antimicrobials: is the residual activity of chlorhexidine an artefact of laboratory methods?

Authors:  J D Rutter; K Angiulo; D R Macinga
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  A unique water optional health care personnel handwash provides antimicrobial persistence and residual effects while decreasing the need for additional products.

Authors:  Lawton A Seal; Ronald L Rizer; Rainer Maas-Irslinger
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 10.  Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.

Authors:  Judith Tanner; Jo C Dumville; Gill Norman; Mathew Fortnam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  Antiseptic Agents Elicit Short-Term, Personalized, and Body Site-Specific Shifts in Resident Skin Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Adam J SanMiguel; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Charles W Bradley; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Surgical hand preparation in an equine hospital: Comparison of general practice with a standardised protocol and characterisation of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus recovered.

Authors:  Tina Rocktäschel; Katharina Renner-Martin; Christiane Cuny; Walter Brehm; Uwe Truyen; Stephanie Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Antibacterial effect on microscale rough surface formed by fine particle bombarding.

Authors:  Tomoko Nishitani; Kyosuke Masuda; Soma Mimura; Takahiko Hirokawa; Hitoshi Ishiguro; Masao Kumagai; Takeshi Ito
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.