Literature DB >> 28131691

Scapula fracture incidence in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using screws above or below metaglene central cage: clinical and biomechanical outcomes.

Justin C Kennon1, Caroline Lu1, Meghan E McGee-Lawrence1, Lynn A Crosby2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a viable treatment option for rotator cuff tear arthropathy but carries a complication risk of scapular fracture. We hypothesized that using screws above the central glenoid axis for metaglene fixation creates a stress riser contributing to increased scapula fracture incidence. Clinical type III scapular fracture incidence was determined with screw placement correlation: superior screw vs. screws placed exclusively below the glenoid midpoint. Cadaveric RTSA biomechanical modeling was employed to analyze scapular fractures.
METHODS: We reviewed 318 single-surgeon single-implant RTSAs with screw correlation to identify type III scapular fractures. Seventeen cadaveric scapula specimens were matched for bone mineral density, metaglenes implanted, and fixation with 2 screw configurations: inferior screws alone (group 1INF) vs. inferior screws with one additional superior screw (group 2SUP). Biomechanical load to failure was analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 206 patients, 9 (4.4%) from the superior screw group experienced scapula fractures (type III); 0 fractures (0/112; 0%) were identified in the inferior screw group. Biomechanically, superior screw constructs (group 2SUP) demonstrated significantly (P < .05) lower load to failure (1077 N vs. 1970 N) compared with constructs with no superior screws (group 1INF). There was no significant age or bone mineral density discrepancy.
CONCLUSION: Clinical scapular fracture incidence significantly decreased (P < .05) for patients with no screws placed above the central cage compared with patients with superior metaglene screws. Biomechanical modeling demonstrates significant construct compromise when screws are used above the central cage, fracturing at nearly half the ultimate load of the inferior screw constructs. We recommend use of inferior screws, all positioned below the central glenoid axis, unless necessary to stabilize the metaglene construct.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse total shoulder; arthroplasty; biomechanical; clinical; complication; metaglene; outcomes; scapula fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28131691     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  16 in total

1.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Periprosthetic Fractures in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Advances in Management.

Authors:  Christopher M Brusalis; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-08

3.  Does Preservation of Coracoacromial Ligament Reduce the Acromial Stress Pathology Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Chang Hee Baek Md; Jung Gon Kim Md; Dong Hyeon Lee Md; Gyu Rim Baek
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 4.  Activity following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: What should surgeons be advising?

Authors:  Scott J MacInnes; Katherine E Mackie; Andrew Titchener; Rebekah Gibbons; Allan W Wang
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-08

Review 5.  Acromial Stress Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher J Lucasti; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 6.  Acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon C Lau; Richard Large
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-10-04

7.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Filippo Familiari; Jorge Rojas; Mahmut Nedim Doral; Gazi Huri; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-02-28

8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has higher perioperative implant complications and transfusion rates than total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mina Botros; Emily J Curry; Jonathan Yin; Andrew Jawa; Josef K Eichinger; Xinning Li
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-06-14

9.  Is Acromial Fracture after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty a Negligible Complication?: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Cho; Jae-Won Jung; Sang-Soo Na; Ki-Cheor Bae; Kyung-Jae Lee; Du-Han Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12

10.  The Anatomical Variation of the Scapular Spine in A Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yimu Lin; Kaifeng Gan; Lei Zhang; Hongrui Wei; Xin Zhou; Hengshu Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.