Literature DB >> 28131683

Differences in humeral retroversion in dominant and nondominant sides of young baseball players.

Daisuke Kurokawa1, Nobuyuki Yamamoto2, Hiroaki Ishikawa3, Hideaki Nagamoto4, Hiroyuki Takahashi5, Takayuki Muraki4, Minoru Tanaka6, Katsumi Sato6, Eiji Itoi7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the disabled throwing shoulder and humeral retroversion has recently attracted a great deal of attention. However, none of the previous studies clarified when the side-to-side difference of humeral retroversion in young baseball players would start. This study aimed to clarify when the difference of humeral retroversion in the dominant and nondominant sides appeared in baseball players.
METHODS: The bicipital-forearm angle in bilateral shoulders of 172 elementary school baseball players was measured by ultrasound. The bicipital-forearm angle was defined as an angle between the perpendicular line to the bicipital groove and the ulnar long axis with the elbow flexed at 90°. The correlation between the bicipital-forearm angle and the grade and the difference of the bicipital-forearm angle between the dominant and nondominant sides were analyzed.
RESULTS: In the nondominant shoulders, the bicipital-forearm angle increased with the grade in school (r = 0.32, P < .0001), but this was not observed in the dominant shoulders. In the fourth to sixth graders, the bicipital-forearm angles were significantly smaller in the dominant shoulders than in the nondominant shoulders.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that humeral retroversion decreased with age in the nonthrowing side but not in the throwing side and that the side-to-side difference of humeral retroversion in the baseball players became obvious from the fourth grade. We assume that the repetitive throwing motion restricts the physiologic humeral derotation process and the difference became apparent from the fourth grade when the growth spurt begins in boys.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Humeral retroversion; Little League shoulder; baseball player; growth period; throwing athlete; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28131683     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Bilateral glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) in elite gymnasts.

Authors:  Ralf J Doyscher; Leopold Rühl; Benjamin Czichy; Konrad Neumann; Timm Denecke; Bernd Wolfarth; Scott A Rodeo; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Residual Effects of Glenohumeral Range of Motion, Strength, and Humeral Retroversion on Prior Overhead Athletes After Cessation of Sport.

Authors:  Jessica L Downs Talmage; Abigail M Cramer; Gretchen D Oliver
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-09

3.  Junior and Collegiate Tennis Players Display Similar Bilateral Asymmetries of Humeral Retroversion.

Authors:  Daniel C Hannah; Jason S Scibek; Christopher R Carcia; Amy L Phelps
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Relationship of clinical measures with humeral torsion in young adults: a pilot study.

Authors:  David M Werner; Eric V Bellm; Joseph M Day
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-05-24

5.  Characteristics of Femoral Torsion Angles and Relationships Between Femoral Torsion Angles and Hip Rotational Motion Variables in Adult Baseball Players.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Katsumasa Sugimoto; Hideyuki Goto; Atsushi Tsuchiya; Tetsuya Takenaga; Keishi Takaba; Masayoshi Saito; Hidenori Futamura; Hideki Murakami; Masahito Yoshida
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.