Literature DB >> 28131543

Predictors of Functional Recovery Following Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures.

John A Ruder1, Gavin P Hart2, Jeffrey S Kneisl1, Bryan D Springer3, Madhav A Karunakar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for periprosthetic distal femur fractures include open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and distal femoral replacement (DFR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications, and functional recovery (ambulatory status, living situation, mortality) in patients undergoing operative treatment (DFR and ORIF) of periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 58 patients with distal femoral periprosthetic fractures treated with either ORIF or DFR was conducted. Surgical complications, discharge disposition, ambulatory status, living situation at 1 year, and mortality at 1 year were compared between patients treated with ORIF and DFR. Outcomes at 1 year were also compared between patients older and younger than 85 years of age.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with a mean age of 80 years (range, 61-95 years) met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 29.5 months (range, 5-81 months). Patients undergoing DFR were significantly older than those who underwent ORIF (83 vs 78, P < .01). The 1-year mortality rate was 20.6%. There was no difference between groups with respect to mortality, complications, discharge disposition, or ambulatory status and living situation at 1 year. Patients who lost the ability to ambulate at 1 year were significantly older than patients who maintained the ability to ambulate (87.5 vs 76.4 years, P < .05). Patients older than 85 years were more likely to lose the ability to ambulate and to live in a skilled nursing facility at 1 year (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Distal femoral periprosthetic fractures have a high morbidity and mortality. Age at time of injury, not treatment rendered, is predictive of ambulatory status and living independence after periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory status; distal femoral replacement arthroplasty; older adults; open reduction; periprosthetic distal femur fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28131543     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Quinzi; Gabriel Ramirez; Nathan B Kaplan; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  DXA evaluation of femoral bone mineral density and cortical width in patients with prior total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Blaty; D Krueger; R Illgen; M Squire; B Heiderscheit; N Binkley; P Anderson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Surgical outcomes of periprosthetic distal femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty classified by Su et al. system.

Authors:  Matthew Mazur; Julia Beyer; Mazzin Elsamaloty; Devon Patel; Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-11

4.  A comparison of distal femoral replacement versus fixation in treating periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Ponugoti; Aashish Raghu; Jonathan David Kosy; Henry Magill
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and retained total knee arthroplasty treated with polyaxial locking plates: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Lotzien; Clemens Hoberg; Martin F Hoffmann; Thomas A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-22

6.  Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; James Millar; Jonathan Quayle; Bill Farrington; Peter Nicholas Misur
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Surgical Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Antonia Loosen; Yannick Fritz; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-02

8.  Immediate weight-bearing is safe following lateral locked plate fixation of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Oisin J F Keenan; Lauren A Ross; Matthew Magill; Matthew Moran; Chloe E H Scott
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-25

9.  Demographics, Treatment, and Cost of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: Fixation Versus Revision.

Authors:  Katelyn Ragland; Rebecca Reif; Saleema Karim; Kevin W Sexton; Steven M Cherney; Jeffrey B Stambough; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.