Literature DB >> 28131362

Phylogenetic Pattern, Evolutionary Processes and Species Delimitation in the Genus Echinococcus.

A J Lymbery1.   

Abstract

An accurate and stable alpha taxonomy requires a clear conception of what constitutes a species and agreed criteria for delimiting different species. An evolutionary or general lineage concept defines a species as a single lineage of organisms with a common evolutionary trajectory, distinguishable from other such lineages. Delimiting evolutionary species is a two-step process. In the first step, phylogenetic reconstruction identifies putative species as groups of organisms that are monophyletic (share a common ancestor) and exclusive (more closely related to each other than to organisms outside the group). The second step is to assess whether members of the group possess genetic exchangeability (where cohesion is maintained by gene flow among populations) or ecological exchangeability (where cohesion is maintained because populations occupy the same ecological niche). Recent taxonomic reviews have recognized nine species within the genus Echinococcus. Phylogenetic reconstructions of the relationships between these putative species using mtDNA and nuclear gene sequences show that for the most part these nine species are monophyletic, although there are important incongruences that need to be resolved. Applying the criteria of genetic and ecological exchangeability suggests that seven of the currently recognized species represent evolutionarily distinct lineages. The species status of Echinococcus canadensis and Echinococcus ortleppi could not be confirmed. Coalescent-based analyses represent a promising approach to species delimitation in these closely related taxa. It seems likely, from a comparison of sister species groups, that speciation in the genus has been driven by geographic isolation, but biogeographic scenarios are largely speculative and require further testing.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeography; Phylogeny; Population genetics; Speciation; Species concepts

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28131362     DOI: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Parasitol        ISSN: 0065-308X            Impact factor:   3.870


  20 in total

1.  Epidemiological survey on cystic echinococcosis in wild boar from Central Italy.

Authors:  Barbara Paoletti; Leonardo Della Salda; Angela Di Cesare; Raffaella Iorio; Alberto Vergara; Camilla Fava; Alberto Olivastri; Giorgia Dessì; Antonio Scala; Antonio Varcasia
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Comparative Mitochondrial Genomic Analysis Robustly Supported That Cat Tapeworm Hydatigera taeniaeformis (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) Represents a Species Complex.

Authors:  Hui-Mei Wang; Rong Li; Yuan-Ping Deng; Guo-Hua Liu; Yi-Tian Fu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  International consensus on terminology to be used in the field of echinococcoses.

Authors:  Dominique A Vuitton; Donald P McManus; Michael T Rogan; Thomas Romig; Bruno Gottstein; Ariel Naidich; Tuerhongjiang Tuxun; Hao Wen; Antonio Menezes da Silva
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Cystic and alveolar echinococcosis: Successes and continuing challenges.

Authors:  Christine M Budke; Adriano Casulli; Peter Kern; Dominique A Vuitton
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-04-20

5.  DNA extraction from hydatid cyst protoscolices: Comparison of five different methods.

Authors:  Afshin Barazesh; Bahador Sarkari; Sepideh Ebrahimi; Mehdi Hami
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-02-22

6.  Revisiting the Phylogenetic History of Helminths Through Genomics, the Case of the New Echinococcus oligarthrus Genome.

Authors:  Lucas L Maldonado; Juan Pablo Arrabal; Mara Cecilia Rosenzvit; Guilherme Corrêa De Oliveira; Laura Kamenetzky
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Cystic echinococcosis in Nigeria: first insight into the genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus in animals.

Authors:  John Asekhaen Ohiolei; Hong-Bin Yan; Li Li; Abdullahi Alhaji Magaji; Joshua Luka; Guo-Qiang Zhu; Clement Isaac; Manfred Ebube Odoya; Yan-Tao Wu; Mughees Aizaz Alvi; Rosline James Muku; Bao-Quan Fu; Wan-Zhong Jia
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 8.  Green Micro- and Nanoemulsions for Managing Parasites, Vectors and Pests.

Authors:  Lucia Pavoni; Roman Pavela; Marco Cespi; Giulia Bonacucina; Filippo Maggi; Valeria Zeni; Angelo Canale; Andrea Lucchi; Fabrizio Bruschi; Giovanni Benelli
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.076

9.  Determination of Echinococcus Granulosus Genotypes in Livestock Slaughtered in Shush County, Southwest Iran Using PCR-RFLP.

Authors:  S Fallahizadeh; R Arjmand; A Jelowdar; A Rafiei; F Kazemi
Journal:  Helminthologia       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 1.184

10.  Echinococcus multilocularis Infection, Southern Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Jonathon D Kotwa; Mats Isaksson; Claire M Jardine; G Douglas Campbell; Olaf Berke; David L Pearl; Nicola J Mercer; Eva Osterman-Lind; Andrew S Peregrine
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.