Christopher Huett1, Torsten Baehner1, Felix Erdfelder1, Claudia Hoehne2, Christian Bode1, Andreas Hoeft1, Richard K Ellerkmann3. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bonn University Hospital, Sigmund Freud Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bonn University Hospital, Sigmund Freud Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany. richard.ellerkmann@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although pediatric emergence delirium (ED) is common, preventive and therapeutic pharmacological treatment is the matter of an international controversial discussion and evidence on different options is partially vague. OBJECTIVE: We therefore examined clinical routine in prevention strategies and postoperative therapy of ED with respect to clinical experience in pediatric anesthesia. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed investigating routine management (prevention and treatment) of ED, facility structure, and patient population. The link was sent to all enlisted members of the German Society of Anesthesiology. RESULTS: We analyzed 1229 questionnaires. Overall, 88% reported ED as a relevant clinical problem; however, only 5% applied assessment scores to define ED. Oral midazolam was reported as standard premedication by 84% of respondents, the second largest group was 'no premedication' (5%). The first choice prevention strategy was to perform total intravenous (propofol) anesthesia (63%). The first choice therapeutic pharmacological treatment depended on clinical experience. Therapeutic propofol was preferentially chosen by more experienced anesthesiologists (5 to >20 patients per week, n = 538), while lesser experienced colleagues (<5 patients per week, n = 676) preferentially applied opioids. Dexmedetomidine (1%) and non-pharmacological (2%) therapy were rarely stated. The highest satisfaction levels for pharmacological therapy of ED were attributed to propofol. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is the preferred choice for pharmacological prevention and treatment of ED among German anesthesiologists. Further therapy options as well as alternatives to a midazolam-centered premedication procedure are underrepresented.
INTRODUCTION: Although pediatric emergence delirium (ED) is common, preventive and therapeutic pharmacological treatment is the matter of an international controversial discussion and evidence on different options is partially vague. OBJECTIVE: We therefore examined clinical routine in prevention strategies and postoperative therapy of ED with respect to clinical experience in pediatric anesthesia. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed investigating routine management (prevention and treatment) of ED, facility structure, and patient population. The link was sent to all enlisted members of the German Society of Anesthesiology. RESULTS: We analyzed 1229 questionnaires. Overall, 88% reported ED as a relevant clinical problem; however, only 5% applied assessment scores to define ED. Oral midazolam was reported as standard premedication by 84% of respondents, the second largest group was 'no premedication' (5%). The first choice prevention strategy was to perform total intravenous (propofol) anesthesia (63%). The first choice therapeutic pharmacological treatment depended on clinical experience. Therapeutic propofol was preferentially chosen by more experienced anesthesiologists (5 to >20 patients per week, n = 538), while lesser experienced colleagues (<5 patients per week, n = 676) preferentially applied opioids. Dexmedetomidine (1%) and non-pharmacological (2%) therapy were rarely stated. The highest satisfaction levels for pharmacological therapy of ED were attributed to propofol. CONCLUSIONS:Propofol is the preferred choice for pharmacological prevention and treatment of ED among German anesthesiologists. Further therapy options as well as alternatives to a midazolam-centered premedication procedure are underrepresented.
Authors: Zeev N Kain; Alison A Caldwell-Andrews; Linda C Mayes; Megan E Weinberg; Shu-Ming Wang; Jill E MacLaren; Ronald L Blount Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Vinícius Caldeira Quintão; Charlize Kessin de Oliveira Sales; Estefania Morales Herrera; Richard K Ellerkmann; H David Rosen; Maria José Carvalho Carmona Journal: Braz J Anesthesiol Date: 2021-04-03