Literature DB >> 28130728

Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert-type scales in Internet-based personality questionnaires.

Tim Kuhlmann1, Michael Dantlgraber2, Ulf-Dietrich Reips2.   

Abstract

Visual analogue scales (VASs) have shown superior measurement qualities in comparison to traditional Likert-type response scales in previous studies. The present study expands the comparison of response scales to properties of Internet-based personality scales in a within-subjects design. A sample of 879 participants filled out an online questionnaire measuring Conscientiousness, Excitement Seeking, and Narcissism. The questionnaire contained all instruments in both answer scale versions in a counterbalanced design. Results show comparable reliabilities, means, and SDs for the VAS versions of the original scales, in comparison to Likert-type scales. To assess the validity of the measurements, age and gender were used as criteria, because all three constructs have shown non-zero correlations with age and gender in previous research. Both response scales showed a high overlap and the proposed relationships with age and gender. The associations were largely identical, with the exception of an increase in explained variance when predicting age from the VAS version of Excitement Seeking (B10 = 1318.95, ΔR(2) = .025). VASs showed similar properties to Likert-type response scales in most cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet research; Internet science; Likert scale; Measurement; Online questionnaire; Response scale; VAS; Visual analogue scale

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28130728     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0850-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  11 in total

1.  Capturing richer information: On establishing the validity of an interval-valued survey response mode.

Authors:  Zack Ellerby; Christian Wagner; Stephen B Broomell
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-09-07

2.  Association between strong patient-oncologist agreement regarding goals of care and aggressive care at end-of-life for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Sara L Douglas; Barbara J Daly; Amy R Lipson; Eric Blackstone
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Patient-physician discordance in goals of care for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  S L Douglas; B J Daly; N J Meropol; A R Lipson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissistic States in Interpersonal Situations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Edershile; Aidan G C Wright
Journal:  Self Identity       Date:  2019-06-11

5.  Dance Functional Outcome Survey: Development and Preliminary Analyses.

Authors:  Shaw Bronner; Igor Reis Urbano
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2018-11-28

Review 6.  The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Sung; Jeng-Shin Wu
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-08

7.  The Historical Roots of Visual Analog Scale in Psychology as Revealed by Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Natalie Sui Miu Wong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Uses and Resistance Among Public University Students in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mahfuza Marzan; Dewan Zubaer Islam; Halyna Lugova; Ambigga Krishnapillai; Mainul Haque; Salequl Islam
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Patient Experience with Conscious Sedation as a Method of Pain Relief for Transvaginal Oocyte Retrieval: A Cross Sectional Study.

Authors:  Himanshu Singhal; Prasanna S Premkumar; Achamma Chandy; Aleyamma T Kunjummen; Mohan S Kamath
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

10.  Conceptual fluency in inductive reasoning.

Authors:  Michael Dantlgraber; Tim Kuhlmann; Ulf-Dietrich Reips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.