M P Faillace1, A Pisera-Fuster1, M P Medrano1, A C Bejarano1, R O Bernabeu2. 1. Department of Physiology and Institute of Physiology and Biophysics (IFIBIO), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 7th floor, C1121ABG, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. Department of Physiology and Institute of Physiology and Biophysics (IFIBIO), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 7th floor, C1121ABG, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. rbernabeu@fmed.uba.ar.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Zebrafish have a sophisticated color- and shape-sensitive visual system, so we examined color cue-based novel object recognition in zebrafish. We evaluated preference in the absence or presence of drugs that affect attention and memory retention in rodents: nicotine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) phenylbutyrate (PhB). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether nicotine and PhB affect innate preferences of zebrafish for familiar and novel objects after short- and long-retention intervals. METHODS: We developed modified object recognition (OR) tasks using neutral novel and familiar objects in different colors. We also tested objects which differed with respect to the exploratory behavior they elicited from naïve zebrafish. RESULTS: Zebrafish showed an innate preference for exploring red or green objects rather than yellow or blue objects. Zebrafish were better at discriminating color changes than changes in object shape or size. Nicotine significantly enhanced or changed short-term innate novel object preference whereas PhB had similar effects when preference was assessed 24 h after training. Analysis of other zebrafish behaviors corroborated these results. CONCLUSIONS: Zebrafish were innately reluctant or prone to explore colored novel objects, so drug effects on innate preference for objects can be evaluated changing the color of objects with a simple geometry. Zebrafish exhibited recognition memory for novel objects with similar innate significance. Interestingly, nicotine and PhB significantly modified innate object preference.
RATIONALE: Zebrafish have a sophisticated color- and shape-sensitive visual system, so we examined color cue-based novel object recognition in zebrafish. We evaluated preference in the absence or presence of drugs that affect attention and memory retention in rodents: nicotine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) phenylbutyrate (PhB). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether nicotine and PhB affect innate preferences of zebrafish for familiar and novel objects after short- and long-retention intervals. METHODS: We developed modified object recognition (OR) tasks using neutral novel and familiar objects in different colors. We also tested objects which differed with respect to the exploratory behavior they elicited from naïve zebrafish. RESULTS:Zebrafish showed an innate preference for exploring red or green objects rather than yellow or blue objects. Zebrafish were better at discriminating color changes than changes in object shape or size. Nicotine significantly enhanced or changed short-term innate novel object preference whereas PhB had similar effects when preference was assessed 24 h after training. Analysis of other zebrafish behaviors corroborated these results. CONCLUSIONS:Zebrafish were innately reluctant or prone to explore colored novel objects, so drug effects on innate preference for objects can be evaluated changing the color of objects with a simple geometry. Zebrafish exhibited recognition memory for novel objects with similar innate significance. Interestingly, nicotine and PhB significantly modified innate object preference.
Authors: Jakob Haettig; Daniel P Stefanko; Monica L Multani; Dario X Figueroa; Susan C McQuown; Marcelo A Wood Journal: Learn Mem Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 2.460
Authors: Ben Hur M Mussulini; Carlos E Leite; Kamila C Zenki; Luana Moro; Suelen Baggio; Eduardo P Rico; Denis B Rosemberg; Renato D Dias; Tadeu M Souza; Maria E Calcagnotto; Maria M Campos; Ana M Battastini; Diogo L de Oliveira Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matteo M Pusceddu; Julia Hernandez-Baixauli; Francesc Puiggrós; Lluis Arola; Antoni Caimari; Josep M Del Bas; Laura Baselga Journal: Behav Brain Funct Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 3.759