Pamela K Kohler1,2,3, Eva Marumo4, Suzanne L Jed1,3, Gladys Mema3, Sean Galagan1,3, Kenneth Tapia1, Erushka Pillay3, Julia DeKadt3, Evasen Naidoo3, Julia C Dombrowski5, King K Holmes1,5,6. 1. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2. Department of Psychosocial and Community Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. International Training and Education Center for Health, University of Washington, Pretoria South Africa. 4. National Department of Health, Pretoria South Africa Civitas Building, Pretoria, South Africa. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Quality concerns in STI service delivery and missed opportunities for integration with HIV testing and prevention services in South Africa have been well documented. This national evaluation aimed to evaluate current utilisation and adherence to national STI guidelines, including partner notification and integration with HIV services, for diagnosis and management of STIs. METHODS: Facility surveys assessed infrastructure and resource availability, and standardised patient (SP) assessments evaluated quality of STI care in 50 public clinics in nine provinces in South Africa. The primary outcome was the proportion of SPs receiving essential STI care, defined as: offered an HIV test, condoms, partner notification counselling and correct syndromic treatment. Weighted proportions were generated, and SP findings were compared by gender using χ2 tests with Rao-Scott correction. RESULTS: More than 80% of facilities reported medications in stock, with the exceptions of oral cefixime (48.3%), oral erythromycin (75.1%) and paediatric syrups. Among 195 SP encounters, 18.7% (95% CI 10.7% to 30.5%) received all hypothesised essential STI services: offered HIV test (67.1%), offered condoms (31.4%), partner notification counselling (70.2%) and recommended syndromic treatment (60.7%). Men were more likely than women to be offered all services (25.1% vs 12.3%, p=0.023), recommended treatment (70.7% vs 50.9%, p=0.013) and partner notification counselling (79.9% vs 60.6%, p=0.020). Only 6.3% of providers discussed male circumcision with male SPs, and 26.3% discussed family planning with female SPs. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation of STI services across South Africa found gaps in the availability of medications, adherence to STI guidelines, condom provision and prevention messaging. Limited integration with HIV services for this high-risk population was a missed opportunity. Quality of STI care should continue to be monitored, and interventions to improve quality should be prioritised as part of national strategic HIV and primary healthcare agendas. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVES: Quality concerns in STI service delivery and missed opportunities for integration with HIV testing and prevention services in South Africa have been well documented. This national evaluation aimed to evaluate current utilisation and adherence to national STI guidelines, including partner notification and integration with HIV services, for diagnosis and management of STIs. METHODS: Facility surveys assessed infrastructure and resource availability, and standardised patient (SP) assessments evaluated quality of STI care in 50 public clinics in nine provinces in South Africa. The primary outcome was the proportion of SPs receiving essential STI care, defined as: offered an HIV test, condoms, partner notification counselling and correct syndromic treatment. Weighted proportions were generated, and SP findings were compared by gender using χ2 tests with Rao-Scott correction. RESULTS: More than 80% of facilities reported medications in stock, with the exceptions of oral cefixime (48.3%), oral erythromycin (75.1%) and paediatric syrups. Among 195 SP encounters, 18.7% (95% CI 10.7% to 30.5%) received all hypothesised essential STI services: offered HIV test (67.1%), offered condoms (31.4%), partner notification counselling (70.2%) and recommended syndromic treatment (60.7%). Men were more likely than women to be offered all services (25.1% vs 12.3%, p=0.023), recommended treatment (70.7% vs 50.9%, p=0.013) and partner notification counselling (79.9% vs 60.6%, p=0.020). Only 6.3% of providers discussed male circumcision with male SPs, and 26.3% discussed family planning with female SPs. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation of STI services across South Africa found gaps in the availability of medications, adherence to STI guidelines, condom provision and prevention messaging. Limited integration with HIV services for this high-risk population was a missed opportunity. Quality of STI care should continue to be monitored, and interventions to improve quality should be prioritised as part of national strategic HIV and primary healthcare agendas. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
AFRICA; HEALTH SERV RESEARCH; IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SERVICE DELIVERY
Authors: Jessica J C King; Jishnu Das; Ada Kwan; Benjamin Daniels; Timothy Powell-Jackson; Christina Makungu; Catherine Goodman Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Sophia Taleghani; Dvora Joseph-Davey; Scott B West; Henry J Klausner; Adriane Wynn; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Kate S Wilson; Cyrus Mugo; David Bukusi; Irene Inwani; Anjuli D Wagner; Helen Moraa; Tamara Owens; Joseph B Babigumira; Barbra A Richardson; Grace C John-Stewart; Jennifer A Slyker; Dalton C Wamalwa; Pamela K Kohler Journal: Trials Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Elizabeth Karman; Kate S Wilson; Cyrus Mugo; Jennifer A Slyker; Brandon L Guthrie; David Bukusi; Irene Inwani; Grace C John-Stewart; Dalton Wamalwa; Pamela K Kohler Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2020 Jan-Dec
Authors: Anna Larsen; Kate S Wilson; John Kinuthia; G John-Stewart; B A Richardson; Jillian Pintye; Felix Abuna; Harison Lagat; Tamara Owens; Pamela Kohler Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ranmini S Kularatne; Ronelle Niit; Jane Rowley; Tendesayi Kufa-Chakezha; Remco P H Peters; Melanie M Taylor; Leigh F Johnson; Eline L Korenromp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pierre P M Thomas; Ramesh R Allam; Elena Ambrosino; Jelena Malogajski; Jonathan A Lal; Servaas A Morré; Remco P H Peters Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2018-11-09
Authors: Tendesayi Kufa; Venessa D Maseko; Duduzile Nhlapo; Frans Radebe; Adrian Puren; Ranmini S Kularatne Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 1.889