Shona Horter1, Zanele Thabede2, Velibanti Dlamini3, Sarah Bernays4, Beverley Stringer5, Sikhathele Mazibuko6, Lenhle Dube7, Barbara Rusch8, Kiran Jobanputra9. 1. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), London, UK; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: shona_horter@yahoo.co.uk. 2. MSF, Nhlangano, Swaziland. Electronic address: zanethab@gmail.com. 3. MSF, Nhlangano, Swaziland. Electronic address: msfch-nhlangano-qualitativeresearch@geneva.msf.org. 4. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: sarah.bernays@lshtm.ac.uk. 5. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), London, UK. Electronic address: beverley.stringer@london.msf.org. 6. Swaziland National AIDS Programme, Ministry of Health of Swaziland, Mbabane, Swaziland. Electronic address: smazibuko11@gmail.com. 7. Swaziland National AIDS Programme, Ministry of Health of Swaziland, Mbabane, Swaziland. Electronic address: lenhlep@yahoo.com. 8. MSF, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: barbara.rusch@geneva.msf.org. 9. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), London, UK. Electronic address: kiran.jobanputra@london.msf.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Timely uptake of antiretroviral therapy, adherence and retention in care for people living with HIV (PLHIV) can improve health outcomes and reduce transmission. Médecins Sans Frontières and the Swaziland Ministry of Health provide community-based HIV testing services (HTS) in Shiselweni, Swaziland, with high HTS coverage but sub-optimal linkage to HIV care. This qualitative study examined factors influencing linkage to HIV care for PLHIV diagnosed by community-based HTS. METHODS: Participants were sampled purposively, exploring linkage experiences among both genders and different age groups. Interviews were conducted with 28 PLHIV (linked and not linked) and 11 health practitioners. Data were thematically analysed to identify emergent patterns and categories using NVivo 10. Principles of grounded theory were applied, including constant comparison of findings, raising codes to a conceptual level, and inductively generating theory from participant accounts. RESULTS: The process of HIV status acceptance or denial influenced the accounts of patients' health seeking and linkage to care. This process was non-linear and varied temporally, with some experiencing non-acceptance for an extended period of time. Non-acceptance was linked to perceptions of HIV risk, with those not identifying as at risk less likely to expect and therefore be prepared for a positive result. Status disclosure was seen to support linkage, reportedly occurring after the acceptance of HIV status. HIV status acceptance motivated health seeking and tended to be accompanied by a perceived need for, and positive value placed on, HIV health care. CONCLUSIONS: The manner in which PLHIV process a positive result can influence their engagement with HIV treatment and care. Thus, there is a need for individually tailored approaches to HTS, including the potential for counselling over multiple sessions if required, supporting status acceptance, and disclosure. This is particularly relevant considering 90-90-90 targets and the need to better support PLHIV to engage with HIV treatment and care following diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Timely uptake of antiretroviral therapy, adherence and retention in care for people living with HIV (PLHIV) can improve health outcomes and reduce transmission. Médecins Sans Frontières and the Swaziland Ministry of Health provide community-based HIV testing services (HTS) in Shiselweni, Swaziland, with high HTS coverage but sub-optimal linkage to HIV care. This qualitative study examined factors influencing linkage to HIV care for PLHIV diagnosed by community-based HTS. METHODS:Participants were sampled purposively, exploring linkage experiences among both genders and different age groups. Interviews were conducted with 28 PLHIV (linked and not linked) and 11 health practitioners. Data were thematically analysed to identify emergent patterns and categories using NVivo 10. Principles of grounded theory were applied, including constant comparison of findings, raising codes to a conceptual level, and inductively generating theory from participant accounts. RESULTS: The process of HIV status acceptance or denial influenced the accounts of patients' health seeking and linkage to care. This process was non-linear and varied temporally, with some experiencing non-acceptance for an extended period of time. Non-acceptance was linked to perceptions of HIV risk, with those not identifying as at risk less likely to expect and therefore be prepared for a positive result. Status disclosure was seen to support linkage, reportedly occurring after the acceptance of HIV status. HIV status acceptance motivated health seeking and tended to be accompanied by a perceived need for, and positive value placed on, HIV health care. CONCLUSIONS: The manner in which PLHIV process a positive result can influence their engagement with HIV treatment and care. Thus, there is a need for individually tailored approaches to HTS, including the potential for counselling over multiple sessions if required, supporting status acceptance, and disclosure. This is particularly relevant considering 90-90-90 targets and the need to better support PLHIV to engage with HIV treatment and care following diagnosis.
Authors: Joseph Daniels; Robert Marlin; Alex Medline; Greg Wilson; Sean Young; Lina Rosengren; Emily Huang; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Stephen Opoku; Samuel Asamoah Sakyi; Nana Kwame Ayisi-Boateng; Anthony Kwame Enimil; Ebenezer Senu; Richard Owusu Ansah; Bismark Dankwah Aning; Diana Atsieno Ojuang; Doreen Nafula Wekesa; Fatima Osman Ahmed; Chidinma B Okeke; Ama Darkoaa Sarfo Journal: AIDS Res Ther Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 2.846
Authors: Brendan Maughan-Brown; Sean Beckett; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Cherie Cawood; David Khanyile; Lara Lewis; Atheendar Venkataramani; Gavin George Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2020-02-09