Literature DB >> 28129415

Motion coherence and direction discrimination in healthy aging.

Karin S Pilz1, Louisa Miller2, Hannah C Agnew1.   

Abstract

Perceptual functions change with age, particularly motion perception. With regard to healthy aging, previous studies mostly measured motion coherence thresholds for coarse motion direction discrimination along cardinal axes of motion. Here, we investigated age-related changes in the ability to discriminate between small angular differences in motion directions, which allows for a more specific assessment of age-related decline and its underlying mechanisms. We first assessed older (>60 years) and younger (<30 years) participants' ability to discriminate coarse horizontal (left/right) and vertical (up/down) motion at 100% coherence and a stimulus duration of 400 ms. In a second step, we determined participants' motion coherence thresholds for vertical and horizontal coarse motion direction discrimination. In a third step, we used the individually determined motion coherence thresholds and tested fine motion direction discrimination for motion clockwise away from horizontal and vertical motion. Older adults performed as well as younger adults for discriminating motion away from vertical. Surprisingly, performance for discriminating motion away from horizontal was strongly decreased. Further analyses, however, showed a relationship between motion coherence thresholds for horizontal coarse motion direction discrimination and fine motion direction discrimination performance in older adults. In a control experiment, using motion coherence above threshold for all conditions, the difference in performance for horizontal and vertical fine motion direction discrimination for older adults disappeared. These results clearly contradict the notion of an overall age-related decline in motion perception, and, most importantly, highlight the importance of taking into account individual differences when assessing age-related changes in perceptual functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28129415     DOI: 10.1167/17.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Associations between genetic variations and global motion perception.

Authors:  Marina Kunchulia; Nato Kotaria; Karin Pilz; Adam Kotorashvili; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A Search Advantage for Horizontal Targets in Dynamic Displays.

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Quoc C Vuong; Karin S Pilz
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-04-13

3.  Differential aging effects in motion perception tasks for central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Juan A Sepulveda; Andrew J Anderson; Joanne M Wood; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Detection of scene-relative object movement and optic flow parsing across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Lucy Evans; Rebecca A Champion; Simon K Rushton; Daniela Montaldi; Paul A Warren
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Selective age-related changes in orientation perception.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Juho M Äijälä; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Perception of Coherent Motion in Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome.

Authors:  Bing Dai; Kwang Meng Cham; Larry Allen Abel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The Effects of Glare on the Perception of Visual Motion as a Function of Age.

Authors:  Juan A Sepulveda; Joanne M Wood; Andrew J Anderson; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.048

8.  Age-Related Changes in Global Motion Coherence: Conflicting Haemodynamic and Perceptual Responses.

Authors:  Laura McKernan Ward; Gordon Morison; Anita Jane Simmers; Uma Shahani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.