Literature DB >> 28129280

Reliability of a Field Test of Defending and Attacking Agility in Australian Football and Relationships to Reactive Strength.

Warren B Young1, Mitch P Murray.   

Abstract

Young, WB and Murray, MP. Reliability of a field test of defending and attacking agility in Australian football and relationships to reactive strength. J Strength Cond Res 31(2): 509-516, 2017-Defending and attacking agility tests for Australian football do not exist, and it is unknown whether any physical qualities correlate with these types of agility. The purposes of this study were to develop new field tests of defending and attacking agility for Australian Rules football, to determine whether they were reliable, and to describe the relationship between the agility tests to determine their specificity. Because the reactive strength (RS) of the lower limb muscles has been previously correlated with change-of-direction speed, we also investigated the relationship between this quality and the agility tests. Nineteen male competitive recreational-level Australian Rules football players were assessed on the agility tests and a drop jump test to assess RS. Interday and interrater reliability was also assessed. The agility tests involved performing 10 trials of one-on-one agility tasks against 2 testers (opponents), in which the objective was to be in a position to tackle (defending) or to evade (attacking) the opponent. Both agility tests had good reliability (intraclass correlation > 0.8, %CV < 3, and no significant differences between test occasions [p > 0.05], and interrater reliability was very high [r = 0.997, p < 0.001]). The common variance between the agility tests was 45%, indicating that they represented relatively independent skills. There was a large correlation between RS and defending agility (r = 0.625, p = 0.004), and a very large correlation with attacking agility (r = 0.731, p < 0.001). Defending and attacking agility have different characteristics, possibly related to the footwork, physical, and cognitive demands of each. Nonetheless, RS seems to be important for agility, especially for attacking agility.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28129280     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Applied Sport Science of Australian Football: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rich D Johnston; Georgia M Black; Peter W Harrison; Nick B Murray; Damien J Austin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Agility and change-of-direction speed are two different abilities also during the execution of repeated trials and in fatigued conditions.

Authors:  Gianmarco Ciocca; Antonio Tessitore; Harald Tschan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  A NOVEL TEST TO ASSESS CHANGE OF DIRECTION: DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  Haley Worst; Nancy Henderson; Ryan Decarreau; George Davies
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04

Review 4.  How to Improve the Reactive Strength Index among Male Athletes? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  André Rebelo; João R Pereira; Diogo V Martinho; João P Duarte; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva; João Valente-Dos-Santos
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Alternatives to common approaches for training change of direction performance: a scoping review.

Authors:  Robert Buhmann; Max Stuelcken; Mark Sayers
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-03

6.  Development and trainability of agility in youth: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Lutz Thieschäfer; Dirk Büsch
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-08

7.  Reliability Study of a Functional Test for the Offensive Agility Performance in Water Polo.

Authors:  Marcell Fridvalszki; János Matlák; Bálint Kovács; Leonidas Petridis; Dávid Horváth; Krisztián Havanecz; Donatella Dudás; Gergely Langmár; Levente Rácz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.