Samuel J Kesseli1, Kerrington D Smith, Min K Jung, Yu K Lin, R Matthew Walsh, Betul Hatipoglu, David A Axelrod, Sushela S Chaidarun, Tyler K Stevens, Timothy B Gardner. 1. From the Sections of *Gastroenterology and Hepatology and †General Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; ‡Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, §Department of Endocrinology, Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute, and ∥Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; and Sections of ¶Transplant Surgery and #Endocrinology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation is increasingly being performed remotely, that is, removing the pancreas in 1 location, isolating the islet cells in another location, then returning the islets to the original location for reimplantation into the patient. We determined the influence of extended cold ischemia time on key clinical outcomes in remote islet autotransplantation. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent remote islet autotransplantation at 2 centers from 2011 to 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with and those without a decrease in C-peptide greater than 50% from baseline. The primary clinical outcome was the quantity of isolated islet equivalents per kilogram body weight (IEQs/kg). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 15 had a decrease in C-peptide greater than 50% from baseline and had lower corresponding IEQs/kg compared with those without a decrease greater than 50% (4045 vs 6654 IEQs/kg, P = 0.01). There was no difference in cold ischemia time between the 2 groups (664 vs 600 minutes, P = 0.25). Daily insulin use at 1 year nearly met statistical significance (25.3 vs 8 U, P = 0.06), as did glycated hemoglobin (8.07 vs 6.69 mmol/L, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Cold ischemia time does not influence islet yield in patients undergoing pancreatectomy with remote isolation.
OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation is increasingly being performed remotely, that is, removing the pancreas in 1 location, isolating the islet cells in another location, then returning the islets to the original location for reimplantation into the patient. We determined the influence of extended cold ischemia time on key clinical outcomes in remote islet autotransplantation. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent remote islet autotransplantation at 2 centers from 2011 to 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with and those without a decrease in C-peptide greater than 50% from baseline. The primary clinical outcome was the quantity of isolated islet equivalents per kilogram body weight (IEQs/kg). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 15 had a decrease in C-peptide greater than 50% from baseline and had lower corresponding IEQs/kg compared with those without a decrease greater than 50% (4045 vs 6654 IEQs/kg, P = 0.01). There was no difference in cold ischemia time between the 2 groups (664 vs 600 minutes, P = 0.25). Daily insulin use at 1 year nearly met statistical significance (25.3 vs 8 U, P = 0.06), as did glycated hemoglobin (8.07 vs 6.69 mmol/L, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Cold ischemia time does not influence islet yield in patients undergoing pancreatectomy with remote isolation.
Authors: Philip C Johnston; Yu Kuei Lin; R Matthew Walsh; Rita Bottino; Tyler K Stevens; Massimo Trucco; James Bena; Charles Faiman; Betul A Hatipoglu Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Syed A Ahmad; Andrew M Lowy; Curtis J Wray; David D'Alessio; Kywran A Choe; Laura E James; Andreas Gelrud; Jeffrey B Matthews; Horacio L R Rilo Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2005-09-23 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: J R Lakey; G L Warnock; R V Rajotte; M E Suarez-Alamazor; Z Ao; A M Shapiro; N M Kneteman Journal: Transplantation Date: 1996-04-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: David E R Sutherland; David M Radosevich; Melena D Bellin; Bernard J Hering; Gregory J Beilman; Ty B Dunn; Srinath Chinnakotla; Selwyn M Vickers; Barbara Bland; A N Balamurugan; Martin L Freeman; Timothy L Pruett Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: H Ichii; Y Sakuma; A Pileggi; C Fraker; A Alvarez; J Montelongo; J Szust; A Khan; L Inverardi; B Naziruddin; M F Levy; G B Klintmalm; J A Goss; R Alejandro; C Ricordi Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Melena D Bellin; Annelisa M Carlson; Takashi Kobayashi; Angelika C Gruessner; Bernhard J Hering; Antoinette Moran; David E R Sutherland Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Dimitri Van Simaeys; Adriana De La Fuente; Serena Zilio; Alessia Zoso; Victoria Kuznetsova; Oscar Alcazar; Peter Buchwald; Andrea Grilli; Jimmy Caroli; Silvio Bicciato; Paolo Serafini Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 17.694