Amy M Sawyer1,2, Tonya S King3, Terri E Weaver4, Douglas A Sawyer5, Miranda Varrasse2, Jamie Franks6, Alexa Watach5, Ann M Kolanowski5, Kathy C Richards7. 1. a College of Nursing , Pennsylvania State University, University Park , Pennsylvania. 2. b School of Nursing , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania. 3. c Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics , Penn State Hershey College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania. 4. d Biobehavioral Health Science , University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing , Chicago , Illinois. 5. e College of Nursing , Penn State University, University Park , Pennsylvania. 6. f Sleep Center, Hershey Center for Applied Research , Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center , Hershey , Pennsylvania. 7. g School of Nursing , George Mason University , Fairfax , Virginia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND:Positive airway pressure (PAP) is highly efficacious treatment but nonadherence is prevalent with little improvement over the last 15 years. Tailored interventions show promise for promoting adherence to other treatments. The study objective was to examine feasibility and acceptability of a tailored intervention to promote PAP adherence. PARTICIPANTS: The convenience sample met inclusion criteria: newly diagnosed OSA; treatment-naïve; ≥ 18 years. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: previous obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis and treatment; new psychiatric diagnosis; use of oxygen/bilevel PAP; secondary sleep disorder. Adults (n = 118) were randomized to tailored intervention (TI; n = 61) or usual care (UC; n = 57); application of a priori exclusion criteria resulted in 30 participants per assignment who were middle-aged (51.3 ± 11.1 years) adults (70% male) with severe OSA (apnea hypopnea index [AHI], 35.9 ± 25.2). METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, single-site pilot controlled trial. A multiphased tailored intervention targeting social cognitive perceptions of OSA-PAP treatment was delivered at four intervals. Descriptive analysis, group differences, and self-efficacy change scores by t-test, and thematic analysis of acceptability data are reported. RESULTS: One-week PAP use among TI was 35 min greater than UC condition (p = 0.20; Cohen's d = 0.336). Treatment use decreased at 1 month and 3 months (NS). Per-protocol delivery of face-to-face intervention delivery was 100% but lower for telephone intervention delivery. Personalized approach was valued by participants. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored intervention approach is acceptable to participants and feasibly implemented in a clinical sleep center setting. The intervention effect size at 1 week is consistent with other educational PAP adherence interventions but was not sustained; further pilot testing is warranted to address pilot RCT limitations.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is highly efficacious treatment but nonadherence is prevalent with little improvement over the last 15 years. Tailored interventions show promise for promoting adherence to other treatments. The study objective was to examine feasibility and acceptability of a tailored intervention to promote PAP adherence. PARTICIPANTS: The convenience sample met inclusion criteria: newly diagnosed OSA; treatment-naïve; ≥ 18 years. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: previous obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis and treatment; new psychiatric diagnosis; use of oxygen/bilevel PAP; secondary sleep disorder. Adults (n = 118) were randomized to tailored intervention (TI; n = 61) or usual care (UC; n = 57); application of a priori exclusion criteria resulted in 30 participants per assignment who were middle-aged (51.3 ± 11.1 years) adults (70% male) with severe OSA (apnea hypopnea index [AHI], 35.9 ± 25.2). METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, single-site pilot controlled trial. A multiphased tailored intervention targeting social cognitive perceptions of OSA-PAP treatment was delivered at four intervals. Descriptive analysis, group differences, and self-efficacy change scores by t-test, and thematic analysis of acceptability data are reported. RESULTS: One-week PAP use among TI was 35 min greater than UC condition (p = 0.20; Cohen's d = 0.336). Treatment use decreased at 1 month and 3 months (NS). Per-protocol delivery of face-to-face intervention delivery was 100% but lower for telephone intervention delivery. Personalized approach was valued by participants. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored intervention approach is acceptable to participants and feasibly implemented in a clinical sleep center setting. The intervention effect size at 1 week is consistent with other educational PAP adherence interventions but was not sustained; further pilot testing is warranted to address pilot RCT limitations.
Authors: F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard; Terry Young; Laurel Finn; Khin Mae Hla; Ramon Farré Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-05-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Francisco Campos-Rodriguez; Nicolas Peña-Griñan; Nuria Reyes-Nuñez; Ines De la Cruz-Moron; Jose Perez-Ronchel; Francisco De la Vega-Gallardo; Ana Fernandez-Palacin Journal: Chest Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Kingman P Strohl; Daniel B Brown; Nancy Collop; Charles George; Ronald Grunstein; Fang Han; Lawrence Kline; Atul Malhotra; Alan Pack; Barbara Phillips; Daniel Rodenstein; Richard Schwab; Terri Weaver; Kevin Wilson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Miriam R Weiss; Michelle L Allen; Jeremy S Landeo-Gutierrez; Jenny P Lew; Julia K Aziz; Sylvan S Mintz; Claire M Lawlor; Benjamin J Becerra; Diego A Preciado; Gustavo Nino Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.062