Literature DB >> 28128796

Surveillance of sight loss due to delay in ophthalmic treatment or review: frequency, cause and outcome.

B Foot1, C MacEwen2.   

Abstract

PurposeTo determine the frequency of patients suffering harm due to delay in ophthalmic care in the UK over a 12-month period.MethodsPatients with deterioration in vision in at least one eye of 3 lines of Snellen acuity or 15 letters on ETDRS chart or deterioration in visual field deviation of 3 decibels due to health service initiated delay in review or care were ascertained through the BOSU using prospective active surveillance involving all UK consultant ophthalmologists. Demographic details, diagnosis, cause and length of delay, and vision loss were then sought by questionnaire.Results238 cases reported between March 2015 and February 2016. 197/238 questionnaires were returned (83%). Twenty-eight reports were out of the study period or did not meet the case definition. Median age was 76 years (range: 1 to 98 years). Median delay was 22 weeks (range: 2 days to 5½ years). Seventy two per cent experienced permanent reduction in visual acuity, 23% permanent deterioration in visual field. Main diagnoses were Glaucoma 42%, Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) 23%, and Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) 16%. Eighteen patients were eligible for Severely Sight Impaired (SSI) or Sight Impaired (SI) registration. Main causes were delayed follow-up (76%), lost referral (7%), and delayed treatment (8%).ConclusionPatients are suffering preventable harm due to health service initiated delay leading to permanently reduced vision. This is occurring in patients of all ages, but most consistently in those with chronic conditions. Delayed follow-up or review is the cause in the majority of cases indicating a lack of capacity within the hospital eye service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28128796      PMCID: PMC5437335          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  The British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit: an evaluation of the first 3 years.

Authors:  B Foot; M Stanford; J Rahi; J Thompson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Displacement of nuclear fragments into the vitreous complicating phacoemulsification surgery in the UK: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  S Mahmood; H von Lany; M D Cole; S J Charles; C R H James; B Foot; P Gouws; S Shaw
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Depression and anxiety in visually impaired older people.

Authors:  Jennifer R Evans; Astrid E Fletcher; Richard P L Wormald
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Visual loss and falls: a review.

Authors:  A Dhital; T Pey; M R Stanford
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  The effect of appointment rescheduling on monitoring interval and patient attendance in the glaucoma outpatient clinic.

Authors:  A Tatham; I Murdoch
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepatitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont.

Authors:  R L Vogt; D LaRue; D N Klaucke; D A Jillson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

Authors:  D A Asch; M K Jedrziewski; N A Christakis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alicja R Rudnicka; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Christopher G Owen; Derek G Cook; Deborah Ashby
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Visual impairment and vision-related quality of life in working-age adults: findings in the 1958 British birth cohort.

Authors:  Jugnoo S Rahi; Phillippa M Cumberland; Catherine S Peckham
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A controlled trial of disease surveillance strategies.

Authors:  S B Thacker; S Redmond; R B Rothenberg; S B Spitz; K Choi; M C White
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

  10 in total
  29 in total

1.  How to defuse a demographic time bomb: the way forward?

Authors:  J C Buchan; W Amoaku; B Barnes; A Cassels-Brown; B Y Chang; J Harcourt; D Shickle; A F Spencer; S A Vernon; C MacEwen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Bevacizumab: a new way of doing business. Part 2.

Authors:  Andrew J Lotery; Michael A Burdon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The COVID-19 pandemic will redefine the future delivery of glaucoma care.

Authors:  Hari Jayaram; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Gus Gazzard
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Health technology assessment of new retinal treatments; the need to capture healthcare capacity issues.

Authors:  Richard Gale; Oliver Cox; Craig Keenan; Usha Chakravarthy
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Automated Detection of Glaucoma With Interpretable Machine Learning Using Clinical Data and Multimodal Retinal Images.

Authors:  Parmita Mehta; Christine A Petersen; Joanne C Wen; Michael R Banitt; Philip P Chen; Karine D Bojikian; Catherine Egan; Su-In Lee; Magdalena Balazinska; Aaron Y Lee; Ariel Rokem
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Acceptability and use of glaucoma virtual clinics in the UK: a national survey of clinical leads.

Authors:  Patrick J G Gunn; Joanne R Marks; Leon Au; Heather Waterman; Paul G D Spry; Robert A Harper
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-16

7.  Clinical safety of a minor eye conditions scheme in England delivered by community optometrists.

Authors:  Evgenia Konstantakopoulou; Robert A Harper; David F Edgar; Genevieve Larkin; Sarah Janikoun; John G Lawrenson
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-20

8.  Smartphone-based remote monitoring of vision in macular disease enables early detection of worsening pathology and need for intravitreal therapy.

Authors:  Meriam Islam; Stafford Sansome; Radha Das; Marko Lukic; Kelvin Yi Chong Teo; Gavin Tan; Konstantinos Balaskas; Peter B M Thomas; Lucas M Bachmann; Andrew M Schimel; Dawn A Sim
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-05

9.  Commentary regarding video-based telemedicine triage in emergency ophthalmology during COVID-19.

Authors:  Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer; Jonathan S Myers
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-05-29

10.  Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires.

Authors:  J M Sparrow; M T Grzeda; N A Frost; R L Johnston; C S C Liu; L Edwards; A Loose; D Elliott; J L Donovan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.