Literature DB >> 28128512

Abnormal mismatch repair and other clinicopathologic predictors of poor response to progestin treatment in young women with endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma: a consecutive case series.

M Zakhour1,2, J G Cohen1, A Gibson1, A E Walts3, B Karimian4, A Baltayan4, C Aoyama4, L Garcia5, S K Dhaliwal6, D Elashoff6, M Amneus7, C Walsh2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the response to progestin therapy in young women with endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma (FIGO 1 EAC) based on clinicopathologic features, including abnormal DNA mismatch repair (MMR) by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
DESIGN: Consecutive case series.
SETTING: Olive View-UCLA Medical Center in Sylmar, CA, USA, and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA, USA. POPULATION: Women ≤55 years old with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC.
METHODS: Response to progestin therapy in 84 consecutive patients was assessed based on clinicopathologic factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), initial histology, and IHC staining for MMR proteins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of abnormal MMR protein expression and response to progestin therapy were determined.
RESULTS: Six (7%) patients had abnormal IHC staining, of whom five (83%) had FIGO 1 EAC at initial diagnosis. Following progestin treatment, none of the endometrial lesions in patients with abnormal IHC for MMR proteins had resolution of hyperplasia or malignancy, in contrast to 41 (53%) with normal staining (P = 0.028). Age ≤40 years and initial lesion (CAH versus FIGO 1 EAC) were predictors of response to progestin; BMI was not.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, 7% of women ≤55 years of age with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC had loss of MMR proteins by IHC. These patients had a higher incidence of invasive cancer and a lower incidence of resolution with progestin therapy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Abnormal MMR protein expression predicts poor response to progestins in young women with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC.
© 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex atypical hyperplasia; Lynch syndrome; endometrial cancer; mismatch repair

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28128512     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

1.  Molecular Classification in Patients With Endometrial Cancer After Fertility-Preserving Treatment: Application of ProMisE Classifier and Combination of Prognostic Evidence.

Authors:  Xuting Ran; Tingwenyi Hu; Zhengyu Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  The practice of universal screening for Lynch syndrome in newly diagnosed endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Aifen Wang; Jenna McCracken; Yanjing Li; Lingfan Xu
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14

Review 3.  Efficacy of the LNG-IUS for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early stage endometrial cancer: Can biomarkers predict response?

Authors:  Molly Dore; Sara Filoche; Kirsty Danielson; Claire Henry
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-19

4.  Assessing Post-Treatment Pathologic Tumor Response in Female Genital Tract Carcinomas: An Update.

Authors:  Frediano Inzani; Damiano Arciuolo; Giuseppe Angelico; Angela Santoro; Antonio Travaglino; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Michele Valente; Federica Cianfrini; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amelia Favier; Justine Varinot; Catherine Uzan; Alex Duval; Isabelle Brocheriou; Geoffroy Canlorbe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  Fertility-Sparing Approach in Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Grade 2 Stage IA (FIGO): A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pierluigi Giampaolino; Valeria Cafasso; Dominga Boccia; Mario Ascione; Antonio Mercorio; Francesco Viciglione; Mario Palumbo; Paolo Serafino; Cira Buonfantino; Maria Chiara De Angelis; Paolo Verrazzo; Giovanna Grasso; Giuseppe Gullo; Giuseppe Bifulco; Luigi Della Corte
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Baseline Serum HE4 But Not Tissue HE4 Expression Predicts Response to the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in Atypical Hyperplasia and Early Stage Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Roya Behrouzi; Neil A J Ryan; Chloe E Barr; Abigail E Derbyshire; Y Louise Wan; Zoe Maskell; Katie Stocking; Philip W Pemberton; James Bolton; Rhona J McVey; Emma J Crosbie
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.