| Literature DB >> 28128280 |
Umesh K Reddy1, Padma Nimmakayala1, Venkata Lakshmi Abburi1, C V C M Reddy1, Thangasamy Saminathan1, Richard G Percy2, John Z Yu2, James Frelichowski2, Joshua A Udall3, Justin T Page3, Dong Zhang4, Tariq Shehzad4, Andrew H Paterson4.
Abstract
Use of 10,129 singleton SNPs of known genomic location in tetraploid cotton provided unique opportunities to characterize genome-wide diversity among 440 Gossypium hirsutum and 219 G. barbadense cultivars and landrace accessions of widespread origin. Using the SNPs distributed genome-wide, we examined genetic diversity, haplotype distribution and linkage disequilibrium patterns in the G. hirsutum and G. barbadense genomes to clarify population demographic history. Diversity and identity-by-state analyses have revealed little sharing of alleles between the two cultivated allotetraploid genomes, with a few exceptions that indicated sporadic gene flow. We found a high number of new alleles, representing increased nucleotide diversity, on chromosomes 1 and 2 in cultivated G. hirsutum as compared with low nucleotide diversity on these chromosomes in landrace G. hirsutum. In contrast, G. barbadense chromosomes showed negative Tajima's D on several chromosomes for both cultivated and landrace types, which indicate that speciation of G. barbadense itself, might have occurred with relatively narrow genetic diversity. The presence of conserved linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks and haplotypes between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense provides strong evidence for comparable patterns of evolution in their domestication processes. Our study illustrates the potential use of population genetic techniques to identify genomic regions for domestication.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28128280 PMCID: PMC5269598 DOI: 10.1038/srep41285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1First and second components of principal component analysis (PCA) of 2,084 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within a set of global G. hirsutum accessions (SA: 268 Upland cultivars; TX: 172 landraces).
See Table S3 for a list of accessions and respective eigen values for respective positions of individual accessions in the figure.
Figure 2Phylogenetic trees constructed with neighbor-joining for (A) both Gossypium hirsutum cultivars (red: Upland cultivars; blue: landraces) and Gossypium barbadense cultivars (magenta: cultivated; green: landraces) and (B) cultivars and wild G. hirsutum (green: Upland cultivars; blue and red: two clusters of landraces) and (C) cultivars and landraces of G. barbadense (blue: cultivated; green and red: two clusters of landraces). Distance matrix is in Table S2.
Figure 3Frequency spectrum for the chromosomal means of nucleotide diversity (π) and Tajima’s D for cultivated and non-cultivated G. hirsutum and cultivated and non-cultivated G. barbadense.
Figure 4Manhattan plots of chromosome-wise pairwise F values (mean smoothed) for D_C: (G. barbadense landraces and G. barbadense cultivated); SA_TX (G. hirsutum Upland cultivars and uncultivated G. hirsutum); C_SA (cultivated G. barbadense and cultivated G. hirsutum) and D_TX (landraces of G. barbadense and landraces of G. hirsutum).
Figure 5Haplotype distribution across various chromosomes (A) within cultivars of G. hirsutum and (B) within G. barbadense cultivar accessions. Detailed haplotype tables for G. hirsutum and G. barbadense are in Tables S7 and S8, respectively.
Figure 6Comparative analysis of LD block distribution across various chromosomes in G. hirsutum (h) and G. barbadense (b).
Heat map depicts strength of association.
Chromosome-wise shared LD blocks between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense and significance levels for correspondence.
| Chromosome | Total LD Blocks | Shared | Hypergeometric Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | 9 | 0.00458 |
| 2 | 27 | 12 | 0.00010 |
| 3 | 34 | 9 | 0.00320 |
| 4 | 32 | 12 | 0.00130 |
| 5 | 67 | 37 | 1.29E-07 |
| 6 | 37 | 16 | 0.00041 |
| 7 | 30 | 12 | 0.00021 |
| 8 | 47 | 20 | 5.87E-05 |
| 9 | 37 | 18 | 7.53E-08 |
| 10 | 38 | 18 | 2.58E-03 |
| 11 | 62 | 25 | 3.67E-08 |
| 12 | 48 | 25 | 0.00017 |
| 13 | 49 | 14 | 0.00343 |
| 14 | 42 | 13 | 0.00020 |
| 15 | 58 | 24 | 7.54E-07 |
| 16 | 19 | 6 | 0.11068 |
| 17 | 47 | 25 | 4.05E-05 |
| 18 | 67 | 27 | 2.40E-08 |
| 19 | 19 | 13 | 0.00386 |
| 20 | 40 | 16 | 8.45E-05 |
| 21 | 53 | 25 | 6.65E-07 |
| 22 | 50 | 24 | 3.43E-06 |
| 23 | 47 | 13 | 1.77E-05 |
| 24 | 48 | 24 | 3.88E-05 |
| 25 | 53 | 22 | 1.39E-07 |
| 26 | 42 | 14 | 0.00037 |
*Shared between Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum.