Frederic C Blow1,2,3, Maureen A Walton1,2, Amy S B Bohnert1,2,3, Rosalinda V Ignacio1,3, Stephen Chermack1,4, Rebecca M Cunningham2,5,6, Brenda M Booth7,8, Mark Ilgen1,4,3, Kristen L Barry1. 1. University of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Injury Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Mental Health Service, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI and Hurley Hospital, Flint, MI, USA. 6. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 7. Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. 8. Center for Mental Healthcare Outcomes and Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To examine efficacy of drug brief interventions (BIs) among adults presenting to a low-income urban emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial on drug use outcomes at 3, 6 and 12 months. Participants were assigned to (1) computer-delivered BI (Computer BI), (2) therapist-delivered, computer-guided BI (Therapist BI) or (3) enhanced usual care (EUC-ED) for drug-using adults. Participants were re-randomized after the 3-month assessment to either adapted motivational enhancement therapy (AMET) booster or enhanced usual care booster (EUC-B). SETTING:Patients recruited from low-income urban emergency departments (ED) in Flint, Michigan, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 780 ED patients reporting recent drug use, 44% males, meanage = 31 years. INTERVENTIONS: Computer BI consisted of an interactive program guided by a virtual health counselor. Therapist BI included computer guidance. The EUC-ED conditions included review of community health and HIV prevention resources. The BIs and boosters were based on motivational interviewing, focusing on reduction of drug use and HIV risk behaviors. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was past 90 days using drugs at 6 and 12 months and secondary outcomes were weighted drug-days and days of marijuana use. FINDINGS: Percentage changes in mean days used any drug from baseline to 12 months were: Computer BI + EUC-B: -10.9%, P = 0.0844; Therapist BI + EUC-B: -26.7%, P = 0.0041, for EUC-ED + EUC-B: -20.9, P = 0.0011. In adjusted analyses, there was no significant interaction between ED intervention and booster AMET for primary and secondary outcomes. Compared with EUC-ED, Therapist BI reduced number of days using any drug [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.41, -0.07, P = 0.0422] and weighted drug-days (95% CI = -0.41, -0.08, P = 0.0283). Both Therapist and Computer BI had significantly fewer number of days using marijuana compared to EUC-ED (Therapist BI: 95% CI = -0.42, -0.06, P = 0.0104, Computer BI: 95% CI = -0.34, -0.01, P = 0.0406). Booster effects were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: An emergency department-based motivational brief intervention, delivered by a therapist and guided by computer, appears to reduce drug use among adults seeking emergency department care compared with enhanced usual care. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To examine efficacy of drug brief interventions (BIs) among adults presenting to a low-income urban emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial on drug use outcomes at 3, 6 and 12 months. Participants were assigned to (1) computer-delivered BI (Computer BI), (2) therapist-delivered, computer-guided BI (Therapist BI) or (3) enhanced usual care (EUC-ED) for drug-using adults. Participants were re-randomized after the 3-month assessment to either adapted motivational enhancement therapy (AMET) booster or enhanced usual care booster (EUC-B). SETTING:Patients recruited from low-income urban emergency departments (ED) in Flint, Michigan, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 780 ED patients reporting recent drug use, 44% males, mean age = 31 years. INTERVENTIONS: Computer BI consisted of an interactive program guided by a virtual health counselor. Therapist BI included computer guidance. The EUC-ED conditions included review of community health and HIV prevention resources. The BIs and boosters were based on motivational interviewing, focusing on reduction of drug use and HIV risk behaviors. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was past 90 days using drugs at 6 and 12 months and secondary outcomes were weighted drug-days and days of marijuana use. FINDINGS: Percentage changes in mean days used any drug from baseline to 12 months were: Computer BI + EUC-B: -10.9%, P = 0.0844; Therapist BI + EUC-B: -26.7%, P = 0.0041, for EUC-ED + EUC-B: -20.9, P = 0.0011. In adjusted analyses, there was no significant interaction between ED intervention and booster AMET for primary and secondary outcomes. Compared with EUC-ED, Therapist BI reduced number of days using any drug [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.41, -0.07, P = 0.0422] and weighted drug-days (95% CI = -0.41, -0.08, P = 0.0283). Both Therapist and Computer BI had significantly fewer number of days using marijuana compared to EUC-ED (Therapist BI: 95% CI = -0.42, -0.06, P = 0.0104, Computer BI: 95% CI = -0.34, -0.01, P = 0.0406). Booster effects were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: An emergency department-based motivational brief intervention, delivered by a therapist and guided by computer, appears to reduce drug use among adults seeking emergency department care compared with enhanced usual care. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Herbert C Duber; Isabel A Barata; Eric Cioè-Peña; Stephen Y Liang; Eric Ketcham; Wendy Macias-Konstantopoulos; Shawn A Ryan; Mark Stavros; Lauren K Whiteside Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Lillian Gelberg; Ronald M Andersen; Melvin W Rico; Mani Vahidi; Guillermina Natera Rey; Steve Shoptaw; Barbara D Leake; Martin Serota; Kyle Singleton; Sebastian E Baumeister Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Erin E Bonar; Brooke J Arterberry; Alan K Davis; Rebecca M Cunningham; Frederic C Blow; R Lorraine Collins; Maureen A Walton Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Erin E Bonar; Maureen A Walton; Kristen L Barry; Amy S B Bohnert; Stephen T Chermack; Rebecca M Cunningham; Lynn S Massey; Rosalinda V Ignacio; Frederic C Blow Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Laura E Drislane; Rebecca Waller; Meghan E Martz; Erin E Bonar; Maureen A Walton; Stephen T Chermack; Frederic C Blow Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 6.526