Literature DB >> 28127671

Molecular and cellular insights into Zika virus-related neuropathies.

Kai Zhou1,2, Long Wang1, Di Yu1, Hesuyuan Huang1, Hong Ji3, Xuming Mo4.   

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV), a relatively elusive Aedes mosquito-transmitted flavivirus, had been brought into spotlight until recent widespread outbreaks accompanied by unexpectedly severe clinical neuropathies, including fetal microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in the adult. In this review, we focus on the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms by which vertically transmitted microorganisms reach the fetus and trigger neuropathies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guillain–Barré syndrome; Microcephaly; Neurodevelopment; Zika virus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28127671      PMCID: PMC5440482          DOI: 10.1007/s13365-017-0514-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurovirol        ISSN: 1355-0284            Impact factor:   2.643


Introduction

The tropical pathogen Zika virus (ZIKV), an Aedes mosquito-borne flavivirus, is an emerging arbovirus, initially discovered in Uganda as early as 1940s, but the geographic range has expanded drastically, marching across Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia, between January 1, 2007 and March 1, 2016 (Haddow et al. 2012; Wikan and Smith 2016). ZIKV remained relatively elusive due to the most asymptomatic and quiet moderate nature and of the infection, and, when self-limited febrile symptoms are present, typically characterized by skin rash, conjunctivitis, and joint pain, just resembling that of dengue fever and chikungunya (Brasil and Nielsen-Saines 2016). However, recent widespread outbreaks had brought ZIKV into spotlight, as evidence denoting that ZIKV has been causally associated with adverse fetal microcephaly in newborns (Malkki 2016a) and severe neurological injuries in adults including Guillain–Barré syndrome (Malkki 2016b; Parra et al. 2016; van den Berg et al. 2014). In addition to the increase of severe illnesses, novel modes of ZIKV deliveries have been detected, including sexual transmission (Hills et al. 2016) and maternal-fetal transmission (Brasil and Nielsen-Saines 2016; Brasil et al. 2016b). Presence of ZIKV in the male semen and female genital tract poses notable challenges, implying that ZIKV can be spread through sexual intercourse and by vertical ransmission (D’Ortenzio et al. 2016; Mansuy et al. 2016; Petersen et al. 2016; Prisant et al. 2016). ZIKV was reported in the amniotic fluid and placenta of pregnant women whose fetuses had been diagnosed with microcephaly, and microcephalic fetal neural tissues, indicating that ZIKV can breach the placental barrier and invade the fetus (Calvet et al. 2016; Martines et al. 2016; Mlakar et al. 2016). The explosive and unprecedented cases of microcephaly and Guillain–Barré syndrome prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on February 1, 2016 (Heymann et al. 2016) and to advocate researches into possible causal relationships and underlying mechanisms of ZIKV-induced neurologic disorders.

Molecular insights into ZIKV

Despite epidemic in Africa and Asia during the past half century, ZIKV infections were not linked to severe human disorders until now. It has been postulated that genetic variations of the ZIKV genome may have contributed to its accelerated transmissibility and infectivity, enhanced neurotropism, and increased replicative capacity. Due to the remaining elusive reasons for this, molecular insight into this virus may benefit our understanding of the biology of ZIKV and vaccines development. ZIKV is an enveloped flavivirus with a nearly 10,800 nucleotides positive-sense RNA molecule. The derived single polyprotein is processed after translation into three structural proteins (capsid [C], precursor Membrane [prM], and envelope [E]) and 7 nonstructural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5) by host and viral proteases (Kuno and Chang 2007). Structural protein C interacts with the viral RNA to construct a nucleocapsid, prM inhibits premature viral fusion with host membranes, and E, the viral fusogen, regulates cellular attachment, accelerates membrane fusion, and releases the viral genome into the host (Lazear and Diamond 2016; Mukhopadhyay et al. 2005), whereas the viral nonstructural proteins mediate viral transcription and replication and also mitigate host antiviral responses (Diamond and Pierson 2015; Lazear and Diamond 2016; Mukhopadhyay et al. 2005; Suthar et al. 2013). To inspect the molecular evolution of ZIKV, Wang L et al. (2016) conducted phylogenetic and genetic studies. Interestingly, two major lineages of ZIKV, African and Asian, was detected, whereas the contemporary human strains derive from the Asian lineage (Faria et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2016). Numerous genetic variations in ZIKV genomes has been revealed, along of which ZIKV has evolved from causing only a benign disease to trigger adverse neurological disorders (Baronti et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2016). Structural modeling studies suggest that genetic variations of ZIKV could elicit specific structural changes of prM protein, which could play a role in neurotropism and neurovirulence. Future experiments are eagerly required to determine how such amino acid or nucleotide substitutions impact the increased epidemic potential, neurotropism, and pathogenesis. ZIKV is closely linked to dengue virus, belonging to the family Flaviviridae. Both genetically and serologically, ZIKV is associated with the four serotypes of dengue with approximately 43% amino acid sequence consensus (Lanciotti et al. 2008). Intriguingly, several antibodies isolated from dengue patients potently neutralize ZIKV through targeting a conformational epitope (Barba-Spaeth et al. 2016; Pierson and Graham 2016). The structural basis of potent Zika–dengue virus antibody cross-neutralization was revealed by comparing the Zika and dengue virus immunocomplexes, providing a lead for rational, epitope-directed design of a universal vaccine enough for inducing potent cross-reactivity antibodies to opposing Zika and dengue viruses simultaneously (Barba-Spaeth et al. 2016).

Animal models developed for ZIKV researches

In light of the catastrophic outcomes of this rapidly emerging infectious disease, it is urgently required to develop animal models of in utero ZIKV infection, which facilitate to define the plausibility of causal relationships between ZIKV and neurological diseases, and to assess the mechanisms of congenital abnormalities (Broutet et al. 2016; Rasmussen et al. 2016). In humans, the placenta plays a pivotal role in preventing vertical transmission of viruses (Coyne and Lazear 2016; Pastula et al. 2016). The question of whether the placenta is permissive to viral breaching has been challenging to resolve and confirm the mode of sexual and maternal-fetal transmission of ZIKV. Several particularly novel and relevant mouse models, the most powerful tools for biomedical researches by far, are established to unravel the mysteries of placental breaching and transmission. ZIKV invades multiple primary human placental cell types and explants, suggesting placental and paraplacental routes of virus mother-to-fetus transmission routes (Quicke et al. 2016; Tabata et al. 2016). Lazear et al. (2016) established a mouse model lacking interferon α/β receptor 1 (Ifnar1 −/−), which succumb to infection and exhibits neurological destruction, accompanied by high viral loads in the brain and spinal cord, as well as in the spleen, testes, and serum, which is consistent with severe symptoms of ZIKV in humans, as did a IFN regulatory factor (Irf)3 −/− Irf5 −/− Irf7 −/− triple knockout mouse strain that are deficient for type I IFN production (Lazear et al. 2016). Genetic deletion and antibody blockade of Ifnar1 early in pregnancy causes infection of the placenta and embryonic brain, leading to in utero growth restriction and spontaneous pregnancy losses reported in ZIKV-infected pregnant women (Miner et al. 2016a; Suter and Aagaard 2016). Li et al. (2016b) utilizes Irf3 −/− Irf5 −/− Irf7 −/− triple knockout strain to inoculate virus into the peripheral circulation by retro-orbital injection, rather than direct injection into the brain, to simulate the blood-borne transmission (Li et al. 2016b). Moreover, a nonhuman primate model was established to closely emulate human pathologies by injecting a current ZIKV strain subcutaneously in five locations on the forearms of a pregnant pigtail macaque at 119 days gestation, which is beneficial for the development of therapeutics and vaccines that could attenuate intrauterine infection of ZIKV (Abbink et al. 2016; Adams Waldorf et al. 2016; Dowd et al. 2016). Periventricular lesions were significantly detected in the nonhuman primate model, along with cerebral white matter hypoplasia, periventricular white matter gliosis, and axonal and ependymal injury (Adams Waldorf et al. 2016).

Cellular and molecular mechanisms implied in ZIKV-induced microcephaly

By far, the global alarm of the Zika virus is its great threat to fetal brain. ZIKV infection and microcephaly are causally associated based on epidemiological data indicating an increased risk of microcephaly coinciding with the ZIKV outbreak (Brasil et al. 2016a; Brasil et al. 2016b; de Fatima Vasco Aragao et al. 2016; Hayes 2009; Sarno et al. 2016). However, definitive proofs are still needed to confirm the causality between the viral epidemic and malformations in fetal brains. During telencephalic development, neural progenitor cells (NPCs) proliferate, differentiate into numerous fates, migrate to their apposite positions, and maturate into a precisely orchestrated human brain, capable of higher-order language, cognition, and emotion (Budday et al. 2015). Disturbance of these processes resulted in neurodevelopmental disorders including fetal microcephaly, thought to derive from the depletion of NPC population, either through premature differentiation or loss of NPCs (Barkovich et al. 2012; Kriegstein and Alvarez-Buylla 2009; Molyneaux et al. 2007; Wilsch-Brauninger et al. 2016; Wollnik 2010; Woodworth et al. 2012). The NPCs in the fetal brain appear to be probably impacted, due to its greater susceptibility to the neurotropism and neurovirulence of ZIKV infection. Several recent studies provide some tractable experimental systems for modeling the impact of ZIKV on neurodevelopment and inspecting underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms. The original ZIKV strain MR766 can directly infect NPCs derived from human induced pluripotent neural stem cells (hiPSCs) with high efficiency in vitro, and the infected hiNPCs also release infectious viral particles (Tang et al. 2016). ZIKV infection elicits dysregulation of cell cycle progression and cell loss of hiPSCs, attenuating their viability and growth as neurospheres and brain organoids (Garcez et al. 2016; Qian et al. 2016; Tang et al. 2016). Animal models of human fetal infection are still needed to understand when, how, and why ZIKV invades developing brain, and provide the more detailed landscape of ZIKV-induced neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Cugola et al. (2016) inoculated Brazilian ZIKV strain into the brains of unborn SJL pups and detected cerebral malformations in the surviving fetuses, with decreased number of neural cells and cortical layer thickness, pathologies linked to fetal microcephaly in humans (Cugola et al. 2016). Upon close inspection of the ZIKV-infected mouse brains, Li et al. revealed that ZIKVSZ01 replicated in the embryonic mouse brain, suppressed proliferation and differentiation of NPCs after infection, ultimately leading to signs related with microcephaly (Li et al. 2016a). Wu et al. developed another mouse model by intraperitoneal injection of a contemporary ZIKV strain into the maternal mice, which provide evidence that ZIKV could be vertically transmitted from the pregnant mice to their fetuses (Wu et al. 2016). ZIKV invaded fetal brain results in a decrease in the proliferative pool of cerebral NPCs (Wu et al. 2016). Neurotropic ZIKV could gain entry into the CNS and cause disease through many surface proteins, such as the candidate AXL receptor, which facilitates ZIKV to invade the developing CNS (Luethy et al. 2016; Nowakowski et al. 2016; Perera-Lecoin et al. 2013). Intriguingly, Nowakowski et al. (2016) assessed the expressive patterns of candidate ZIKV entry proteins by single-cell RNA-seq and revealed that conserved and high AXL expression in NPCs could render this neural cell population selectively susceptible to ZIKV infection (Nowakowski et al. 2016). Consistently, many candidate ZIKV entry receptors were significantly elicited, most strikingly AXL in animal models of ZIKV-induced microcephaly (Li et al. 2016a). ZIKV infection elicits the deregulation of genes related to neurogenesis like Nestin and Sox2, differentiation, apoptotic pathways, and immune response-associated factors including TLR3, which has been validated in several independent in vivo and in vitro studies (Dang et al. 2016; Li et al. 2016a; Li et al. 2016b; Tang et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2016). Multiple key cellular signaling cascades, including the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway, are critical for neurogenesis from NPCs, as well as for subsequent migration and maturation, and autophagy regulation in brain development (Lee 2015; Takei and Nawa 2014). Liang et al. (2016) revealed that after invading of NPCs in the fetal brain, the nonstructural proteins NS4A and NS4B of ZIKV prohibit the Akt-mTOR cascade, disturbing neurogenesis and eliciting autophagy (Liang et al. 2016). Therefore, the above researches define candidate molecular targets of ZIKV pathogenesis and highlight potential determinants for pharmaceutical intervention.

ZIKV linked pathologies beyond congenital microcephaly

ZIKV have numerous cellular tropisms and various factors that contribute to pathogenic consequences, involving defined cellular response and tissue accessibility (Diamond and Pierson 2015; Sips et al. 2012). ZIKV invades optic nerve, retina, iris, and cornea, and trigger panuveitis, conjunctivitis, and neuroretinitis in mice (Miner et al. 2016b). The results from human studies also reveal that ZIKV analogously infects the human ophthalmic tissues and trigger adverse eye illnesses including optic neuritis, chorioretinal atrophy, and blindness in neonates, and conjunctivitis and uveitis in adults (Miner et al. 2016b; Sun et al. 2016). Congenital ocular disease triggered by ZIKV could be due to direct invading of fetal ocular cells. A notable rise in the incidence of GBS, observed in French Polynesia and Colombia during ZIKV outbreaks, respectively, in 2013 and 2016, implies ZIKV a pathogen that can lead to GBS, a severe neurological disease characterized by an immune-mediated progressive muscle weakness that can ultimately trigger flaccid paralysis and respiratory failure (Malkki 2016b; Parra et al. 2016; van den Berg et al. 2014). Moreover, ZIKV can produce neurological outcomes, including demyelinating polyneuropathy and brachial plexopathy and recently acute meningoencephalitis in adult (Carteaux et al. 2016). These neurological disorders may in fact be consequences of ZIKV exposure in adult. Utilizing triply Irf-disrupted mice, Li et al. (2016b) revealed that blood-borne ZIKV administration can infect NPCs, causing cell death and decreased proliferation, in the adult neurogenic zones (Li et al. 2016b). We note that ZIKV also infects other human cell types, including skin cells and fibroblasts (Hamel et al. 2015). Intriguingly, an early mouse research observed ZIKV infection of neurons and astrocytes and detected enlarged astrocytes (Bell et al. 1971). ZIKV also invades immature neurons and astrocytes with lower efficiency in mice (Bell et al. 1971; Tang et al. 2016). These findings raise pivotal concerns about pathological effects on neurons and other cell types in the central and peripheral nervous system, as well as potential long-term outcomes.

Conclusion

ZIKV-linked neuropathology is an eager global health alarm. Accumulated evidence from clinical, imaging, laboratory, and pathological assessment provided a more complete landscape of the severe neurological abnormalities triggered by ZIKV infection. After crossing the placental-fetal barrier, ZIKV breaches the fetal brain and invades neural stem cells as the primary target population with the highest AXL expression. By preferentially disrupting neural stem cells, the founder cells that generate all neuronal and glial cells, leading to neural cell death by autophagy and apoptosis, ZIKV can impair brain development and generate adverse microcephaly. The term congenital Zika syndrome is preferable to refer to these cases, as microcephaly is just one of the clinical signs of this congenital malformation abnormality. Moreover, results suggest that adult as well as fetal neural stem cells are susceptible to ZIKV infection. Broad cellular tropisms of ZIKV on numerous cell types could induce adverse long-term consequences.
  69 in total

Review 1.  Neuroinvasive flavivirus infections.

Authors:  Gregorius J Sips; Jan Wilschut; Jolanda M Smit
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 6.989

2.  A common mechanism for microcephaly.

Authors:  Bernd Wollnik
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Comparison of three neurotropic viruses reveals differences in viral dissemination to the central nervous system.

Authors:  Lauren N Luethy; Andrea K Erickson; Palmy R Jesudhasan; Mine Ikizler; Terence S Dermody; Julie K Pfeiffer
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  Evidence of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus.

Authors:  Eric D'Ortenzio; Sophie Matheron; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Xavier de Lamballerie; Bruno Hubert; Géraldine Piorkowski; Marianne Maquart; Diane Descamps; Florence Damond; Isabelle Leparc-Goffart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Disease watch: Zika virus - placental passage and permissivity for infection.

Authors:  Melissa A Suter; Kjersti M Aagaard
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Full-length sequencing and genomic characterization of Bagaza, Kedougou, and Zika viruses.

Authors:  G Kuno; G-J J Chang
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Peter Abbink; Rafael A Larocca; Rafael A De La Barrera; Christine A Bricault; Edward T Moseley; Michael Boyd; Marinela Kirilova; Zhenfeng Li; David Ng'ang'a; Ovini Nanayakkara; Ramya Nityanandam; Noe B Mercado; Erica N Borducchi; Arshi Agarwal; Amanda L Brinkman; Crystal Cabral; Abishek Chandrashekar; Patricia B Giglio; David Jetton; Jessica Jimenez; Benjamin C Lee; Shanell Mojta; Katherine Molloy; Mayuri Shetty; George H Neubauer; Kathryn E Stephenson; Jean Pierre S Peron; Paolo M de A Zanotto; Johnathan Misamore; Brad Finneyfrock; Mark G Lewis; Galit Alter; Kayvon Modjarrad; Richard G Jarman; Kenneth H Eckels; Nelson L Michael; Stephen J Thomas; Dan H Barouch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Neocortex expansion in development and evolution - from cell biology to single genes.

Authors:  Michaela Wilsch-Bräuninger; Marta Florio; Wieland B Huttner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells.

Authors:  Arnold Kriegstein; Arturo Alvarez-Buylla
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Zika Virus Outbreak in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Clinical Characterization, Epidemiological and Virological Aspects.

Authors:  Patrícia Brasil; Guilherme Amaral Calvet; André Machado Siqueira; Mayumi Wakimoto; Patrícia Carvalho de Sequeira; Aline Nobre; Marcel de Souza Borges Quintana; Marco Cesar Lima de Mendonça; Otilia Lupi; Rogerio Valls de Souza; Carolina Romero; Heruza Zogbi; Clarisse da Silveira Bressan; Simone Sampaio Alves; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Rita Maria Ribeiro Nogueira; Marilia Sá Carvalho; Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis; Thomas Jaenisch
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-04-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Zika virus, a novel mosquito-borne congenital virus infection.

Authors:  J David Beckham
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.643

Review 2.  Zika virus outbreak: a review of neurological complications, diagnosis, and treatment options.

Authors:  Veerendra Koppolu; T Shantha Raju
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.643

Review 3.  Advances in development and application of human organoids.

Authors:  Abhijith Shankaran; Keshava Prasad; Sima Chaudhari; Angela Brand; Kapaettu Satyamoorthy
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Characterization of the Zika virus induced small RNA response in Aedes aegypti cells.

Authors:  Margus Varjak; Claire L Donald; Timothy J Mottram; Vattipally B Sreenu; Andres Merits; Kevin Maringer; Esther Schnettler; Alain Kohl
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-10-17

5.  Transfusion-Transmitted Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Mice Leads to Broad Tissue Tropism With Severe Placental Damage and Fetal Demise.

Authors:  Wanbo Tai; Denis Voronin; Jiawei Chen; Weili Bao; Debra A Kessler; Beth Shaz; Shibo Jiang; Karina Yazdanbakhsh; Lanying Du
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Blockade of Autocrine CCL5 Responses Inhibits Zika Virus Persistence and Spread in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Megan C Mladinich; Jonas N Conde; William R Schutt; Sook-Young Sohn; Erich R Mackow
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 7.  Congenital Zika Syndrome: Genetic Avenues for Diagnosis and Therapy, Possible Management and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gullo; Marco Scaglione; Gaspare Cucinella; Arianna Riva; Davide Coldebella; Anna Franca Cavaliere; Fabrizio Signore; Giovanni Buzzaccarini; Giulia Spagnol; Antonio Simone Laganà; Marco Noventa; Simona Zaami
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Arboviral Infections in Neurological Disorders in Hospitalized Patients in São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Bruno H G A Milhim; Leonardo C da Rocha; Ana C B Terzian; Carolina C P Mazaro; Marcos T Augusto; Adriana Luchs; Nathalia Zini; Livia Sacchetto; Barbara F Dos Santos; Pedro H C Garcia; Rodrigo S Rocha; Elisabete Liso; Vânia M S Brienze; Gislaine C D da Silva; Nikos Vasilakis; Cássia F Estofolete; Maurício L Nogueira
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 9.  Infectious causes of Alice in Wonderland syndrome.

Authors:  Luis Perez-Garcia; Oriana Pacheco; Lourdes Delgado-Noguera; Jean Pilade M Motezuma; Emilia M Sordillo; Alberto E Paniz Mondolfi
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.643

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.