| Literature DB >> 28127398 |
Elda España-Gamboa1, Teresa Vicent2, Xavier Font2, Jorge Dominguez-Maldonado1, Blondy Canto-Canché1, Liliana Alzate-Gaviria1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During hydrous ethanol production from the sugar refinery industry in Mexico, vinasse is generated. Phenolic compounds and melanoidins contribute to its color and make degradation of the vinasse a difficult task. Although anaerobic digestion (AD) is feasible for vinasse treatment, the presence of recalcitrant compounds can be toxic or inhibitory for anaerobic microorganism. Therefore, this study presents new data on the coupled of the FBR (Fluidized Bed Bioreactor) to the UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) reactor under non-sterile conditions by T. versicolor. Nevertheless, for an industrial application, it is necessary to evaluate the performance in this kind of proposal system.Entities:
Keywords: Fluidized bed bioreactor; Hydrous ethanol vinasse; Non-sterile conditions; Recalcitrant compounds; Trametes versicolor; UASB
Year: 2017 PMID: 28127398 PMCID: PMC5259878 DOI: 10.1186/s13036-016-0042-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Eng ISSN: 1754-1611 Impact factor: 4.355
Hydrous ethanol vinasse characterization
| Parameter | Valuea |
|---|---|
| pH | 4.39 ± 0.006 |
| Phenolic compoundsb | 10,834 ± 1476 |
| COD | 110,065 ± 11486 |
| SO4 2- | 5,300 ± 1416 |
| TN | 1,720 ± 217 |
| N-NH3 | 68 ± 9 |
| PO4 3- | 415 ± 67 |
aAll values except pH are expressed in mg/L
bExpressed in gallic acid
Fig. 1Performance of fluidized bed bioreactor in sterile and non-sterile conditions. Phenolic compound removal (■), COD removal (●), color removal (▲), laccase activity (◆), and pH (○)
Summary of the vinasse treatment under sterile and non-sterile conditions
| Microorganism | Substrate | pH | COD removal (%) | Phenolic removal (%) | Color removal (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Cane molasses vinasse 10% v/v sterile | 5.6 | 41 ± 3 | 64 | 16 - 40 | This study |
|
| Cane molasses vinasse 10% v/v non-sterile | 6 - 8 | 38 ± 5 | 67 | 0 | This study |
|
| Beet molasses vinasse + sucrose and KH2PO4 sterile conditions not specified | 5 | 77 | na | 82 | Benito et al. [ |
|
| Beet molasses vinasse + sucrose and KH2PO4 sterile conditions not specified | 8 | It was not observed | na | 10 | Benito et al. [ |
|
| Diluted molasses distillery sterile | 4.5 | 63 | na | 42 | Sun et al. [ |
|
| Vinasse non-sterile | 3 | na | na | 84 | Shayegan et al. [ |
|
| Amarulla distillery wastewater sterile | 7 | 73 | 86 | 0 | Strong [ |
|
| Melanoidins pigments + glucose and sorbose sterile | 4.5 | na | na | 80 | Watanabe et al. [ |
|
| Beet molasses vinasse y sucrose sterile | na | na | na | 45 | Miranda et al. [ |
na Not available
Fig. 2Morphology of pellets of T. versicolor: a) Sterile condition b) Non-sterile condition
Fig. 3Performance of fluidized bed bioreactor in non-sterile condition operated in continuous. Phenolic compound removal (■), COD removal (●), color removal (▲) and laccase activity (◆).*Ren Bio refers to renovation of T. versicolor biomass inside the bioreactor
Characterization of influent and effluent in systems 1 and 2
| System 1 | System 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Vinasse (diluted 7% v/v) | UASB effluent | Vinasse (diluted 10% v/v) | Fluidized bed bioreactor effluent | UASB effluent |
| COD | 7,704 ± 800 | 4,000 ± 570a | 11,000 ± 1,000 | 7,000 ± 93 | 3,940 ± 42a |
| Phenolic compounds | 758 ± 100 | 840 ± 42a | 1,083 ± 150 | 460 ± 40 | 519 ± 10b |
| Color* | 0.10 ± .001 | 0.11 ± 0.003a | 0.13 ± 0.012 | 0.13 ± 0.003 | 0.14 ± 0.005b |
| SO4 2- | 371 ± 90 | 200 ± 56a | 530 ± 141 | 540 ± 50 | 70 ± 40b |
| TN | 120 ± 15 | 723 ± 52a | 172 ± 21 | 688 ± 79 | 408 ± 91b |
| N-NH3 | 5 ± 0.6 | 57 ± 1a | 7 ± 1 | 5 ± 0.7 | 31 ± 4b |
| PO4 3- | 29 ± 5 | 49 ± 6a | 41 ± 7 | 22 ± 2 | 46 ± 7a |
| Biogas production** | - | 2,370 ± 149a | - | - | 1,102 ± 83b |
| Methane content*** | - | 65 ± 5a | - | - | 74 ± 6b |
All values are expressed in mg/L, * Color is the absorbance at 475 nm, ** Biogas production at mL, *** Methane content at percentage. Each value is a mean ± SD. Different case letters indicate significant difference between means of UASB effluent in System 1 and System 2 for each parameter (One-way ANOVA, multiple range test, P < 0.05)
Fig. 4Performance of biogas production and methane content in biogas in: a) System 1 and b) System 2. Biogas production (■) and methane content (◯)